Crude's path: supply shocks, record-low inventories, and targets running from $45 to $90.
The count, last 30 days: 43 bull, 39 bear. The tape leans bull. A count, not a verdict.
The tape vs the talk
The line is WTI crude, last 90 days. Each dot is a claim as it landed on the tape: filled is bull, outlined is bear. Tap a dot to read it. Where the tape went after is context, not a verdict.
The tape
Jun 29
Jul 06
Jul 13
Jul 20
Jul 27
Aug 03
bullbearclaims filed per week
Where the numbers land
as of 2026-08-05 (updated with the morning fetch). Filled dots are claims on the record (tap one); outlined dots are model or scenario numbers. Not investment advice.
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
Responding to the 'Superman monetary policy' question and Neel Kashkari's ('Neil Kaskari' in transcript) view that the Fed has a role addressing supply shocks; she adds the Fed must guard against second-round effects [267960-282800].
So I have definitely been in the, of the view that you should look through supply shocks. I think that, you know, the June PC inflation data, you know, kind of validate that, right? We saw there that when we had the lull in the conflict in the Middle East, oil prices came down, we got inflation relief, right?
Direct rebuttal to Bessent's deal optimism, taped with Andrew Ross Sorkin at Aspen; Reuters is simultaneously reporting the U.S. has used up virtually all its long-range precision missiles.
Even if there is a deal, it's not clear that it's a sustainable deal. We've been through this before, at least our geopolitical team is skeptical that any deal will be enforced. I think we're going to be in a muddle for a while. There are two ways out of the muddle. The first is that the Chinese intervene and really pressure the Iranians for a real deal. The Chinese have shown no inclination to do that. And the second is a significant escalation beyond just air, even ground forces, which we have shown no inclination to do.
Against the reported Iran-Oman toll deal; a fees-based deal unsatisfactory to the president.
We cannot leave Iran in control of the straits of Amuz in any way, shape, or form. That's a fact. We need to go back to pre-February 28th when we began the war. Free navigation, international waters, nobody owns any of it, and nobody can control any of it or influence it.
On the record-high rally after Bessent's deal-today-or-tomorrow line; success has been redefined down to the strait alone.
The market loves what it heard from the Secretary this morning about free navigation. The qualification, and it's an important one, is that all the focus now is simply on the Strait. When the war started, the Strait wasn't the issue. There was a number of other issues that needed to be resolved. Now they've been put aside and all the focus is on the Strait.
From Aspen: don't trust the deal headlines; in a muddle for a while. EVENT: wont (enforced deal), hedged.
Even if there is a deal, it's not clear that it's a sustainable deal. We've been through this before. At least our geopolitical team is skeptical that any deal will be enforced. I think we're going to be in a muddle for a while. They're two ways out of the muddle. The first is that the Chinese intervene and really pressure the Iranians for a real deal. The Chinese have shown no inclination to do that. And the second is a significant escalation beyond just air, even ground forces, which we have shown no inclination to do.
Against the day's 5 percent oil drop: doubts the White House accepts the Iran-Oman Hormuz arrangement. EVENT: wont.
The Omanis and Iran have been discussing a deal on the waterway. I don't see how the White House will agree to this. And so we have this constant cycle of escalation and de-escalation.
Zero ships through Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb on his screen; inventories critical into the midterms.
That continues to be a very important risk because if we do run dry in tanks, especially in Europe, then we may run out of marine fuel, of jet fuel, of fertilizer, of helium. And obviously this creates a jump risk in prices, especially for energy
escalation risk to energy infrastructure. STRENGTH corrected firm->hedged: conditional, framed as the market's fear; he notes the worst case has not materialized
“that's infrastructure that can't easily come back online”
US-Iran strikes in an 11th day, Houthis threatening the Red Sea, oil options positioning at records. He notes this holds 'despite some apparent anticipation that at some stage, Donald Trump will once more pivot towards peace' @84:30, adding Trump is not in a rush to do that.
“Your Brent is substantially above $90 a barrel and looking like it's going to stay there.”
On the collapsed US-Iran memorandum of understanding over the Strait of Hormuz and an 11th night of strikes; he notes Trump said walking away now would have been 'very successful, but they're not going to be doing that' @66:20, and Houthis threatening any ship calling at Saudi ports widens the conflict.
“And until one side buckles, I guess, it's just going to be an escalation, but not back to as bad as where we were. So it looks like it's going to persist for some time yet.”
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -14.0% · 86.83 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Neutral2026-07-22
Answering whether Iran moved centrifuges into Pickaxe Mountain: 'You're talking about the centrifuges. It doesn't mean anything unless they have the materials' @0:44, and 'But we'll be hitting that area pretty soon and very heavily' @1:03. Anchor cites Axios that Trump may launch a massive joint campaign with Israel @1:26.
“We follow the material, that's where the action is, and we'll be hitting that area probably pretty soon.”
He says 'Iran's best days are in the past' @2:03 and that each day of US strikes adds 'months and years to the timeline' for Iran to dig out @2:25; on the nuclear program, 'they cannot build a bomb' because the infrastructure 'just doesn't exist now and won't exist for some time' @3:14.
“So, the notion that Iran will ever get back to the level of threat it was a year ago in the foreseeable future is literally completely off the table.”
Brent was up more than 4 percent toward $95 as both sides played down talks. He reports a wider overnight US attack on Iran and Iranian retaliation on Kuwait, Bahrain and Jordan, and that Tehran believes 'it's the U.S. that should take the first step to de-escalate' @12:34. Same war story as Jennifer Welch on the Jul 21 tape, but a different speaker, so each is filed once from their fullest statement per the Jul 22 addendum.
“the chances or the prospects for an imminent resumption of serious negotiations look quite slim.”
Spoken en route to a dignified transfer ceremony at Dover after the 11th consecutive night of US strikes on Iran @0:59. The next transcript line, 'Everybody wants Iran to have a nuclear weapon' @0:29, is an apparent whisper garble (almost certainly 'Nobody wants') and is excluded from the quote. Reporter notes Rubio said Iran does not 'seem to be serious' about a settlement (paraphrase, not filed).
“Well, Americans aren't against the war, a poll just came out, Americans don't want to have gasoline prices, but they're not against the war, that just came out loud and clear in a poll.”
The post continues 'including those located next to or in the capital city of Tehran' @0:49. Oil prices reacting overnight; matches the video title about threatening retaliation against civilian targets. Filed secondhand: written statement read aloud by the reporter, not Trump's voice.
“anytime the Islamic Republic of Iran shoots at a ship in the Strait of Hormuz, whether it be by missile, rocket drone or any other device or weapon, the United States will bomb and destroy one bridge or power plant”
Brent was near $88 on the day; he argues the screen price underprices a delivered barrel because refined products are already short in Europe ('it's still trading at a price as if oil was more than one hundred dollars' @16:36), citing a 25-minute diesel queue outside Paris and knocked-out Russian refining. Bab el-Mandeb closure would hit 'around 30 percent of global oil supply of oil and gas' @16:59.
“I should. We should see around one hundred dollars a barrel. And if if the Houthis they close the bottom end up straights I think we should see around one hundred and fifty dollars a barrel.”
Ryan Lemand · Neovision Wealth Management (CEO, co-founder); spelling verified against the on-screen Bloomberg name plate, Jul 22 · Bloomberg ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -12.1% · 84.91 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
She argues Iran's leadership sees this as existential and can absorb pain, its drone capability is cheap and hard to eliminate, and that commercial shippers and insurers, not governments, decide when the strait is effectively open: 'Iran doesn't have to do much at all to raise the perception of risk. And that will be a very difficult matter to resolve' @12:39.
“And so continuing to attack these assets that are being used to affect shipping is probably not going to be enough to change Iran's strategic calculus.”
Karen Gibson · Academy Securities Geopolitical Intelligence Group (advisor; retired Lieutenant General) · Bloomberg ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -12.1% · 84.91 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
After 10 nights of strikes he notes two more tankers were attacked overnight off the UAE and Oman ('clearly there's no decline in Iran's ability to continue to threaten shipping' @6:19). On the Houthi Red Sea threat: 'it's a big deal. Assuming it happens' @6:50 and 'it's something the market needs to pay a lot of attention to' @7:43. Bloomberg staff analysis rather than a guest, filed because he takes an explicit directional view on the threat's persistence.
“it's very hard to see going forward how many more nights of U.S. military attacks will it take before that capability is eliminated completely. One would think that it might be almost impossible.”
On the US-Iran war and the Houthi threat to Red Sea shipping. She says 'what we're in now is an escalation spiral with the United States and Iran both looking to gain leverage' @17:24, and asked if it gets worse before it gets better answers 'I think it will. And I don't know that it will actually ever get better.' @17:59. Earlier she calls the Houthi Red Sea threat 'yet another point of economic pain for the global economy' @15:43. The Jul 22 tape covers the same war via Onur Ant, a different speaker, so both are filed once.
“we are likely to land ourselves in what we're referring to as a low-intensity protracted conflict or a forever war”
Host: all-out-war headlines and a Houthi threat to blockade Saudi Arabia, yet 'Brent WTI up less than one percent each' @0:12. Speaker adds 'some people were long into the sell off' and are taking off positions @0:27, plus rumors of a six-day Iran-US ceasefire: 'we may see something that establishes some sort of ceasefire in the coming days' @1:03. Caveats 'I haven't traded the market in a few months so I can't be confident' @0:35.
“The market is paying attention. The market is exhausted.”
Michelle Brouhard · Energy market commentator (via Bloomberg TV); self-describes as a trader who has not traded the market in a few months · Bloomberg ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -12.1% · 84.91 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Asked whether a truce would restore shipper confidence. Adds 'I think it does include a toll booth. I think it includes a framework that looks like a security framework' @2:14, likely rebranded as 'maritime security' @2:26, and 'that's going to take a while to form' @2:10.
“I think we're getting to the point now where the Strait of Hormuz and the Red Sea for that matter need to have a new framework. Right. The framework of the freedom of the seas. That framework is broken”
Michelle Brouhard · Energy market commentator (via Bloomberg TV); self-describes as a trader who has not traded the market in a few months · Bloomberg ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -12.1% · 84.91 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
'The real constraint is refined products' @3:24: no product exports from the Middle East plus constrained Russian refined products, while crude has had 'Herculean responses' (Chinese import drop, Saudi/UAE rerouting, SPR) @3:38. '5 10' is whisper for $5.10 diesel. Also questions the '43 day supply' SPR headline as underspecified @4:35 while noting 70 million barrels of committed SPR releases remain @5:34.
“refined products continue to remain significantly tighter than crude. And they have our attention as well. We've got gasoline back above four dollars on average and diesel at 5 10.”
Michelle Brouhard · Energy market commentator (via Bloomberg TV); self-describes as a trader who has not traded the market in a few months · Bloomberg ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -12.1% · 84.91 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Brent above $90 after a ninth night of US strikes on Iran (from ~$70 at the start of July). 'Yields will have to reprice higher if you're going to have oil in a sustained period where it's 90 plus' @7:20; 'That is not a pretty picture for anybody really' @7:35.
“So for some time we were getting used to oil being in a nice range between 70 and 80 dollars. Now we're suddenly thinking it might be in a 90 to 100 dollar range again.”
With Brent ~$90.84 and Hormuz flows choked ('$19.91' is whisper's garble of the price level ~$90-91 @64:48): demand 'rising from all these different centers at the same time' @64:32; on $100: 'analysts and traders [I] speak to, are not necessarily throwing out that number yet... when prices rise far enough, demand destruction will happen. So... jury's out' @64:43-64:59.
“So I think the outlook in a sense, pretty bullish, price is probably going to rise.”
Amid nine days of US strikes in Iran and oil closing higher, Smith says tankers are being targeted, three routes have slowed, and shipping through the Strait of Hormuz (a fifth of global oil supply) has 'ground to a halt.'
“So for all intents and purposes, the Strait is basically closed.”
On day nine of US strikes, Esfandiari says both sides are entrenched on red lines with no path to de-escalation; US war goals have shifted from regime change to merely reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and only diplomacy could end it.
“I think right now we are on track towards this becoming the beginning of another forever war.”
He is making the case for oil as an investment: longer-term expectations have reset higher: 'we're looking at values today that are, you know, roughly $70 a barrel, not $60 a barrel' @0:49: and supply security plus high global gas prices ('close to $58 per MMBTU' in Europe @1:27) reinforce it.
“The Strait of Hormuz is not opening anytime soon in the way people expected.”
Soundbite excerpted in a news brief; she adds 'the market is still quite complacent despite the price increase we've seen' @1:34 and 'I expect to see diesel and gasoline prices remain much, much higher' @1:43. Backdrop on tape: WTI hit $85 (highest since mid-June) and national average gas back at $4/gallon.
“Do we think prices should or could go to triple digits? Absolutely. Also, because, remember, the market is short as well.”
Amrita Sen · Energy Aspects (co-founder, head of research) · CNBC ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -10.3% · 83.23 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Marvels that oil experts were 'this wrong' about a Strait of Hormuz disruption: crude traded DOWN through the initial shutdown and only rebounded on renewed bombing. 'I don't fall for the trap again, especially when inflation swaps this week actually went down.' @23:34-23:36; two-year inflation swaps at the week's lows.
“the second you stop bombing, we have the next ceasefire. What's going to happen to crude? I can't imagine it doesn't go straight back down.”
He calls Trump's China election-interference speech 'theatrical misdirection' @10:11 from 'an unresolved war in the Middle East... actually going back into a state of all-out war' @10:22-10:29. Canonical mapped to oil-gas as nearest key: the conflict and Strait of Hormuz closure are the ledger's live oil-price driver.
“I think there's a very real problem that Donald Trump has, which is that the war against Iran may not be wrapped up or stabilized by November. The indicators are that it won't be.”
Asked if he is more or less bullish on oil stocks at $80 than at pre-war $60: 'probably about the same' - 'we think the the stocks are still about as attractive as they were back in january' @16:13. Also 'we are still optimistic on oil prices and holding energy positions for the long term' @15:20; Oxbow re-allocated to energy as oil fell below $70 after the Iran-war spike above $110-120 Brent, and has been adding oil-services names.
“one thing we notice is when you get more geopolitical events like this we think that does raise the floor on the oil price that there is going to be more of a premium on a barrel of oil”
Walking back his earlier higher-for-longer fuel call: 'It's still going to be elevated, but probably, at least for now, it looks like not as high as we feared they might be three or four months ago' @2:30. He credits the oil market's workarounds to the Strait of Hormuz closure ('tankers slipping through without their transponders or pipelines or drawing down inventories' @2:06) and still expects 'a muddle through in Iran' @2:21. Fuel is up $6 billion vs United's start-of-year plan @0:35.
“the oil prices, I don't think, are going to be as high as we suspected.”
She notes the backward-looking data 'are not actually capturing a bunch of what is happening with respect to the conflict in Iran' @0:53, with inflation 'in the mid threes' @0:24 and the labor market 'doing pretty well' @0:34.
“or I suspect upward pressure on oil prices and gas prices is gonna continue in the next few weeks.”
Natasha Sarin · Yale Law School / The Budget Lab (president, co-founder) · CNBC ↗
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -5.4% · 78.95 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Played clip amid the fifth straight day of US-Iran strikes with oil under $80. Immediately before, asked 'Do you see inflation at the end of the year less than it is now?' he answers 'Well, I think so' @0:20. The 'drop like a rock' is conditional on the conflict ending. Clip date not stated on tape; aired Jul 16.
“oil is going to be a little bit of a yo-yo for a while. It goes up a little bit, goes down a little bit, and when this is over, oil is going to drop like a rock.”
Near-term: futures 'telling us the war is over'; the Hormuz tracker says closed yet 57 transponder-on ships in transit; the post-reopening surge hits refineries next week; midterm incentive for lower prices
“I do have a very bullish thesis on oil sort of medium to long term.”
Fox package on the fee reversal; the clip is from ~a month earlier (per the correspondent) rejecting Hormuz tolls in advance; Trump floated and withdrew the 20% fee within 24 hours this week
“It's an international waterway. No country is allowed to charge tolls or fees on an international waterway.”
WTI crude since this was said: ▼ -6.2% · 79.60 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
Bull2026-07-15
'the situation in energy, I would argue, is pretty dire' (@4:49): Hormuz lost again, Ukraine strikes took out 'more than 50% of the refining capacity out of Russia' (@4:35), inventory 'insurance policies' exhausted, and 'there is no strategic petroleum reserve for products' (@10:08). He calls market calm 'the abundance illusion' (@6:56).
“you have diesel, I think in New York, harbors like $130 or $140 a barrel, because we are now witnessing the probability of running into real shortages of products.”
Argues markets look through the war because of workarounds - private inventories, the Saudi east-west pipeline, a mooted third UAE pipeline: 'as long as we have those workarounds in place and we double down on them, we can circumvent the rising price of oil' (@42:48).
“Yeah, I mean, I think anything above $100 a barrel starts to catch investors' attention.”
After a host interjection he adds 'And I think the market is pricing that victory in already' @10:08. Context: six months into the conflict versus a promised six weeks @9:43, WTI cited at $78 on the show @10:47, VIX at 16 @11:54.
“So the outcome is gonna be a huge win for everyone in the world except for Iran. Whether that comes tomorrow or in a few weeks or even in a few months, I still think it's a win for us.”
'This sort of escalation to de-escalate or just simple escalation risks being uncontrolled or risks simply being endless.' (@19:25); on reopening the strait: 'You've got to open it and you've got to maintain it being open. And that is simply not a task that can come without a huge risk and cost to the U.S.' (@20:09); calls the FDI-for-fees swap 'a bit of sleight of hand', no new commitments (@18:06)
“the only way it's going to come to an end is a negotiated end.”
Military assessment: tactically sound, strategically not deterring Iran; oil relevance inferential (meaning-verified)
“The strikes are probably hitting where they need to. But we don't seem to be moving the ball. We don't seem to be impressing the Iranians tremendously.”
Relative-value claim (0% vs 15.5 FCF yield); BOOK FLAG: he is launching his own oil company
“they pay dividends. And this is why I don't understand is you're buying these hyperscalers that pay, they have 0% free cashflow versus these oil majors at 15.5.”
Named-winner structural call; he adds China gets there first (@23:22)
“The first person who can build out their entire power grid with zero marginal costs, meaning just renewables, batteries, and nuclear power wins. And the Americans and Europeans are so asleep at the wheel, they're arguing about this stuff like it has something to do with the environment.”
MEANING GUARD: his 'oil's dead' is the LONG-RUN structural story (electrified drone warfare), fully consistent with his near-term oil bullishness; quoting it against his oil book without this context is a misread
“war machine 1.0, meaning artificial muscle, tanks and, you know, all the oil driven stuff. That stuff can't hold a candle to the AI drone war kit 2.0.”
Asked if the market pricing containment (Brent high 70s, not 80s-90s) is the right call
“I do. I think it will be contained. I think neither side want to go back to a full conflict, but both sides wanna make that point for domestic reasons.”
“I don't think these talks are going to make that much progress. Both sides' red lines are still too far apart, and neither side has really shown any willingness to move towards the other.”
“We are looking at the potential for a protracted conflict, a long conflict, where you do have these cycles of fighting and rest and reconstitution in order to build up to get ready for the next round of potential attacks.”
“There's been a lot of oil demand destruction globally. And so in addition to everybody figuring out alternative ways to get around, people are figuring out how to consume less.”
“we're a little concerned that what we might see is something closer to $80 for the rest of this year as the globe tries to fill up those strategic reserves and get through the high demand summer season.”
“And if you look at all the gas names, they are all trading at trough levels. So if you're looking to take some of your oil gains and you wanna perhaps take some exposure into the gas names, gas is looking really cheap.”
“I think that if the talks start again and there's no really big military action, I think we go back down to the mid 60s. I think that's another great buying opportunity for investors.”
“I believe that this back and forth tit-for-tat between United States and Iran is just something to drag out for a number of weeks, maybe at the month, a month or two, and then I think they'll get back to the bargaining table”
“So I think we're stuck between 65 and 80. And unless we get above 80 and the Iran situation is worsening where there's no ships going through Hormuz, I just don't think it matters for the markets.”
“I did not expect that China would cut crude oil imports by 5 million barrels a day, between February and June. That is our gargantuan swing. That alone absorbed roughly half to two thirds of the Asian crude oil deficit alone.”
“China is now arguably the single is taking the spot of the United States and even Saudi Arabia as the kind of key swing balance in the global oil market”
Managed-money net positioning at its low of the year, he says
“when we got down to like low 70s on Brent that was probably at least 10 bucks was just that net short kind of weighing down on the front contract in particular. Now I expect that to reverse.”
“So I think we're going to have this big J flip on the other side that you always need a fundamental trigger we didn't know what it was going to be but now it seems like we might get a re closure the Strait of Hormuz and a rebar a reentry of China to the crude oil market and on water all at the same time which is kind of the ultimate trigger for this short covering event that was bound to happen eventually”
'strait or homos' is the tape's rendering of Strait of Hormuz
“I'm not that convinced that we are going to see pre-war levels of flows from strait or homos and the market will soon see that as well, I believe, when we look at the inventory picture for products.”
“I think therefore the demand increase, supply somewhat decreased because of the crude slate marginal changes in production and the refining kit is not keeping up with those changes”
No new construction era despite record margins, she argues
“So I don't think that for refining, we'll see golden years again in terms of building new kits, because at the end of the day, we also need to acknowledge that the world is moving away from fossil fuels. It is a slow decline, it's not immediate”
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…prediction about oil. Listen to what he told us. The only thing that seems like truth is the price of crude itself. And look at it, $68 a barrel. It's only about, you know, $8 or $9 ahead of where it was before this conflict started. So to me, the market is saying this thing is 98% done and to the general's point, that last 2% could be consequential if something flares up again. So there still should be a bit of a risk premium in crude. However, I think in the middle of next year, crude's going to be at about 45 bucks a barrel. And I think we're already starting to see the reasons why. UAE has increased production. OPEC then increases production to keep their market share. What do you make of that, Kenny? Listen, I'm in the same campus, Jimmy, right? I think oil is going lower. I think, you know, we're going to see the low 60s fairly soon. 45 might be aggressive next year, but I got to kind of think about how that's all playing out. But I definitely think the path of least resistance is down and not up. And so I fully suspect that, you know, the country's going to benefit really because we're going to see oil prices, like I said, get out into the low 60s, which is where they were right prior to the invasion, right ? Where they go beyond that is going to depend on how much this production gets ramped up, how much UAE wants to join. Are they going to let Iran really start selling not much more oil? How much more supply is coming to the market? So, yes, I think Jimmy's right. I'm not sure it's 45, but I certainly think it's lower from here. Not to speak for Ryan Payne, but I do want to bring him into the conversation…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…Once the AI bubble has burst, I'm telling you the US economy is going to hit a break and go into the recession, I would argue. And even a little tiny hint that, you know, the catback story is over, I'm telling you, Gnostics will be down 20% like in no time. There's no doubt in my mind, the US got its ass kicked, in Iran. To me, shocking, as an American, I'm ashamed. Trump decided to essentially concede defeat to the Chinese. This was actually the first proxy war between the United States and China. That if Iran got this far, it had a lot to do with China. I think oil will start hitting higher in about a week's time. I'm pleased to welcome back to the show , David Wu, CEO and founder of David Wu Unbound. On the agenda today, the unwinding of the tech trade, semiconductors fell dramatically this week, especially overseas in the Korea KOSPI Index. Meanwhile, we'll talk about the latest jobs numbers that came out and how markets reacted to a softer than expected jobs number. Also, we'll be talking about the fragile Middle East ceasefire and what's currently going on and whether or not WTI can stay low, we're relatively low at around $70, or we'll start shooting up anytime soon . David, welcome back to the show, good to see you. - Thanks for having me, Mike. - Right now, we have a situation where…From: this video · 6 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…broadening real shift or short lived real shift. Emerging markets or U.S. markets. Emerging markets. Equal weight or market cap. Equal weight. Small caps or large caps. Small caps. More upside in the second half. The Dow or NASDAQ. Dow. Russell or S&P 500. Russell. AI hardware or software. Software. Industrials or tech industri als staples or consumer discretionary discretionary financials or health care. Both. Financials. Real estate or private credit. Real estate. Bigger risk. Geopolitics or inflation inflation. One word to describe the U.S. economy. Res ilient. Straight of her move is resolved by your end or ongoing risk. Resolved. Oil by your end . Higher or lower than 70. Lower. One word for the second half. Productive S& P 500 price target by your end. Eight thousand. Brian Levitt the speediest this or that I think that we've ever had. You certainly are the champion there. That's Brian Levitt Chief Global Market Strategist Evan Ves co. Thank you so much. Thank you. If you enjoyed this street talk check out our full interview with Gareth Soloway. He explains why he expects an over 20 percent pullback for the S&P 500 by your end. He has a fifty six hundred price target.…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…vessels crossing the strait on average every day. And then, of course, you've got the Iranian-U.S. talks, which are on pause right now because Tehran is holding a funeral for its former supreme leader. Kenny, I want to get your reaction because we had James Yorio on with us in the 6 a.m. hour. We asked him about oil and his prediction about oil. Listen to what he told us. The only thing that seems like truth is the price of crude itself. And look at it, $68 a barrel. It's only about, you know, $8 or $9 ahead of where it was before this conflict started. So to me, the market is saying this thing is 98% done and to the general's point, that last 2% could be consequential if something flares up again. So there still should be a bit of a risk premium in crude. However, I think in the middle of next year, crude's going to be at about 45 bucks a barrel. And I think we're already starting to see the reasons why. UAE has increased production. OPEC then increases production to keep their market share. What do you make of that, Kenny? Listen, I'm in the same campus, Jimmy, right? I think oil is going lower. I think, you know, we're going to see the low 60s fairly soon. 45 might be aggressive next year, but I got to kind of think about how that's all playing out. But I definitely think the path of least resistance is down and not up. And so I fully suspect that, you know, the country's going to benefit really because we're going to see oil prices, like I said, get out into the low 60s, which is where they were right prior to the invasion, right…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…Are they going to let Iran really start selling not much more oil? How much more supply is coming to the market? So, yes, I think Jimmy's right. I'm not sure it's 45, but I certainly think it's lower from here. Not to speak for Ryan Payne, but I do want to bring him into the conversation . He and I, he had the same reaction, but you know, Ryan, the journal writes this morning a sudden glut of oil threatens to weaken Iran's hand and talk. So the supply is out there. Yeah, it absolutely is. And you got to think about there's a lot of making up for lost profits, right? If you're Iran right now, if you're OPEC plus, like there's a lot of oil you want to get to the market because you have those revenues to replace. And also you have the UAE, which is not an OPEC plus anymore. They're going to be doing their, you know, their own decisions when it comes to oil production. So I think that's going to ramp up as well. So I think, you know, to Ken's point here, oil glut in the short term, I can see it dropping to low 60s, $45 a barrel might be a little polyannish. And I also think that because like global growth is going up. So oil demand should go up with that. Also, oil security is going to be a problem if you're Japan, do you want all your oil coming from the Strait of Hormuz or 80, 90% so you may be rerouting some of that. And oil companies as well got burnt during fracking when oil prices were too low, made no money. So there's going to be a lot of, I would say profits over production that 'll probably keep a floor under oil prices. And I'm with you, Ken, I think it's closer to $60 a barrel. I don't think it's 45. I mean, I wish it was, but I don't think that's where it's going. Yeah, no, but no, but 60 would be the 60s on 100, to be clear, Kenny, I want to look at yields with you really fast because…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…need for the data center world, for grid improvements, for electricity. That all means a lot more use of fossil fuels, of course, coal is being used a lot more now. When nuclear is coming back, small modular reactors, but the big thing is going to be natural gas and of course crude oil. People talk about demand destruction. We can go into that. I don't agree with that at all. I think it's sophisticated Chinese commodity buyers didn't want to pay $ 110 for crude, so they backed off less like they do in any commodity, cocoa or any of the others when they're high and they're back buying again now that we're $68. So this cycle can go into the 2030s. We're going to see new nominal all time highs for the price of crude before this is over. And I think near term we're in the bott oming phase negotiations on and off in Qatar right now where Switzerland, 65 to 66 is probably the low. Stocks are very cheap. We've had 15, 20% corrections in many of the energy stocks and there's barg ains everywhere. Canada is another big energy producer. We're the fourth largest in the world. The United States- No one talks about it. With oil and natural gas, then you go to Saudi Arabia, then you go to Russia, and then you go to Canada. 6.1 million barrels a day, we're the fourth in the world and we have massive reserves. We've had political problems with a prior government.…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…reserves and the ground. I think we're going to be getting back to that 90 or more in the next three to five years. And again, if you figure a company's reserve value goes up by that commodity deck, if you have growing production, that's how you get your three, five, 10 baggers in the energy stock market. And I think that where we are today, there's a lot of five baggers that I have on the list that we cover. Conservative stocks may only go up double, but some of the entrepreneurial names could be five or 10 baggers. Well, do you look at NatGas as well as oil? Henry Hub NatGas is currently around $ 325, give or take, if you sense. Do you have a similarly bullish outlook for the next two or three years on Nat Gas? I think that NatGas, in terms of commodity demand globally into the next five or 10 years, has a better opportunity than oil does. If you look at the growth of LNG, the announcements and the waiting for FID on the Gulf Coast, we're talking potentially a doubling of the LNG export capacity. Europe doesn't have gas of their own, and so they're going to need more. Asia, countries, South Korea, Japan, China is going to need more. We've got LNG Canada, which is 2BCF a day. But if you look at the FID and the projects in line, we could be six to eight PCF by 2030 or so. But that's where the big demand is going to be as a percent. Remember, we produce 18, 19 BCF in Canada, so you add 6BCF on top of that.…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…attention is shifting to longer-term issues like Canadian pipeline capacity. Albert, of course, now unveiled that proposal for a new West Coast export pipeline that could reshape Canada's energy outlook. Joining us now is Eric Nottle, partner and senior portfolio manager at Nine Point Partners. Eric, thanks as always for joining us. You bet. Good to be with you. Let's start with the Middle East, with the Strait of Hormuz. It looks like it's reopened somewhat normal. Oil prices have dropped. We were talking a month ago about how oil prices were high. Now we're talking maybe, are they too low to some people? I think so. And I really think it's a sentiment challenge, and we really have to reflect on where things stand now. Global onshore oil inventories are at their lowest levels on record. That's despite the biggest release in history from strategic stockpiles. The biggest surprise, I would say, has been the behavior of China. If we look at the beginning of the war, let's call it February, March, there are imports of drop by about three and a half million barrels per day. In June alone, they're down almost five million barrels per day. And so it's just a massive, massive drop. That's resulted in 320 million barrels of forfeited imports. And that's equal to about a quarter of all of the shut-in production from Middle East, because Middle East, we've lost roughly 1.2 billion barrels. And so I think the market is overly bearish now. We're looking at exports and confusing that with production. You mentioned the opener, the strait…From: this video · 4 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…low to some people? I think so. And I really think it's a sentiment challenge, and we really have to reflect on where things stand now. Global onshore oil inventories are at their lowest levels on record. That's despite the biggest release in history from strategic stockpiles. The biggest surprise, I would say, has been the behavior of China. If we look at the beginning of the war, let's call it February, March, there are imports of drop by about three and a half million barrels per day. In June alone, they're down almost five million barrels per day. And so it's just a massive, massive drop. That's resulted in 320 million barrels of forfeited imports. And that's equal to about a quarter of all of the shut-in production from Middle East, because Middle East, we've lost roughly 1.2 billion barrels. And so I think the market is overly bearish now. We're looking at exports and confusing that with production. You mentioned the opener, the strait being open. I checked satellite data last night, 10 ships, oil ships, entered into the stra it. Normal activity is 40. And so the biggest, there's two challenges now, or two things that I'm watching. One is, when does China return to the market? Their drop in imports do not represent demand destruction. I think it's been an intentional act to help offset what was going to be a very , very significant price spike and the impact that that would have had on global economies and therefore Chinese consumers. The second thing I'm watching is still shut-in production. We are not back to normal.…From: this video · 4 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…We haven't even been able to assess what is the productive capacity challenges in countries like Iraq, which have the crappiest reservoirs combined with a very, very bureaucratic entities that have not been able to respond properly. They're down 2.4 million barrels per day as we speak. And we think there'll be a long-term impact to their production. And so simply put, we think the market is too bearish. We were anticipating a oil price sell- off when the strait eventually began to open. We just didn't think it would be from 90 to 68. We thought we would be in the 120s to 140s. When you look at where should oil price be, forget what I think, I'll reference energy aspects, which is a globally respected energy analytical firm. They think that Brent should be at roughly $130 to $140 today, given where inventories stand. Wow. And we're not even close to that. But China, you say they feel like they pull back and are sitting. What happens when they come back in and come back in with a vengeance? That is the one huge thing that we're all watching and waiting for. And so if Chinese demand truly did not fall, when I say demand, road traffic, petrochemicals, et cetera, there's no indicators of meaningful drop in demand. And so the oils had to come from somewhere. And a real challenge with the oil market is we have visible stocks, things that we can see with satellites. They pull up the data every morning, but there's a large amount of invisible stocks.…From: this video · 4 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…right now. The board has recently hired advisors. I think they're assessing our proposal. And we'll expect to hear back from the company at this point. But it took them, I would say, a few weeks to get set up. So everyone in the room is trying to read the next 12 months, rates, geop olitics, AI, cap excite goal that won't quit. When you look at the market today, what 's the biggest disconnect that you can share between price and reality? I think people-- it's never a comfortable feeling to be in the middle of a war, right? So we have the Iran situation. We have the questions about the impact on energy prices, inflation, what the impact will be on the Federal Reserve. All these things are really related to the outcome of this war. I think our house view is this war is not a many months situation. I think in the weeks, maybe it's a four to six weeks resolution. I think once the war is resolved, there will be a lot more focus on the fundamental drivers of the economy. So you're feeling overall positive on the market sentiment right now? Yes. I think once the cloud of uncertainty lifts, I think there are a lot of very powerful forces driving the economy and ultimately the stock market. And companies are reporting very good earnings. We're still in the middle of earnings. Right. That is true. If you had to put all of your capital into a single asset class for the next decade, excluding your own funds, where would it go and why? It would go in equities. Inequities? I would say liquidity, long term growth…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.9% · 68.55 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…carries forward in a very measured way. And that the demand drop that came out of China as they cut refinery runs and transitioned away from some of their more fossil fuel intensive petrochemical activities, isn't going to rebound. And to me, that's just a little bit pessimistic. If you look at the headlines today, China has already said they're gonna roll back some of their product export bans. Immediately that is going to pull forward a little bit more crude demand. And I think that we're overestimating the downside just as we had overestimated the upside at the height of the conflict. - So where do you see prices ending the end of this year, Rebecca? - So I think we can look at the end of the year and I can kind of see Brent Ti, I can see 75 Ti, 80 Brent. And I just think that we're, again, we don't necessarily see this even distribution of flows resumed through to 85, what I think is price is 85% of flows resumed by the end of July is what's priced. I think that might get pushed out and we don't necessarily see, we are seeing this immediate reaction as ships have transited and Iranian sanctions have been waived. But if that gets pulled back, I don't think we see the acceleration of inventory builds that the market's anticipating. So I'm not drastically above the strip. I'm kind of looking 75, 80 Brent Ti.…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.7% · 68.69 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…Yeah, it's a very important question that you ask, because when we think about just the restocking of what's been drawn, by our math, that's roughly 450,000 barrels per day of new demand every day for the next three years just to restock. And we've seen news coming out of countries like India, where I think they're adding a new SPR of 50 million barrels. So there's really a renewed focus on security of supply. It really portends well for Canada. So I think that, again, the market just wants to be bearish right now. It fits the narrative for the broader NASDAQ stocks hitting all time highs, et cetera. Everybody's going to sit in here, and the energy crisis that we are in is not over. The straight over moves is not open. Traffic has not returned to normal. We're down 8.6 million barrels per day of production, and we're hurtling towards the wall unless things radically improve soon. Okay. We have to wrap it up there, Eric, but thank you as always. My pleasure. Eric Nettl, partner and senior portfolio manager at Nine Point Partners.…From: this video · 4 claims mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.7% · 68.69 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…every cycle since the 1970s. Thanks very much for having me, Morgan. I've been in the business since the early 70s. I started out as a merchandising analyst and on the side I was watching the energy side which the firm I was working for didn't have an analyst on. So I just got intrigued by what was going on with OPEC and of course then we had that great cycle from '74 to '81. I did a lot of historical analysis of super cycles and the commodity cycles and you can go back hundreds of years and thousands of years, even precious metals. There's data going back that far and so I became very intrigued about it and so my career from '74 on became focused on energy and I believe we started in my career, the third energy and commodity super cycle. The first one was '74 to '81 I think we all know, subbed to $3 to $36 and of course there were 15 times more move in the Canadian energy index during that time and the big name is Dome Petroleum. Then we had Paul Volcker shutting down inflation and then we had tough trading markets till 1999. In that first cycle, the buyer at the margin was Japan, the Toyotas and the D atsuns, Panasonics and the Sonys. In the '99 to 2008 cycle, it was China. They were producing formula barrels a day consuming three and a half,…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
“This is the peak gasoline demand period… It'll fall off from here. I suspect by Labor Day you will see a considerable price drop at the pump” (~$3.25 vs President's “aspirational” $2.50)
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.7% · 68.69 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…So that's also feeding into this higher gasoline price relative to the crude oil price you're seeing. Yeah, on that subject, I mean, gas prices are still about a dollar per gallon higher than they were when the war in Iran began. So why are those two prices not falling exactly in tandem? Right. I like to use the analogy that the crude oil is the flour, the gasoline is the cake. They got to make that flour into cake. And we just don't have the bakeries going full tilt right now to be able to bring that product to market. So those prices are staying elevated. We're seeing terrific demand here in the United States for gasoline. We got a report this morning that showed really robust gasoline demand. This is the peak, though. This week, the next week, this is the peak gasoline demand period here in the U.S. It'll fall off from here. I suspect by Labor Day you will see a considerable price drop at the pump as well here in the U.S. I don't know about the President's aspirational 250 a gallon, but certainly down around 325 is a realistic target for that time period. The war has also illustrated how much leverage Iran really has over global oil prices. Do you think its ability to control the Strait of Hormuz will create a more volatile energy market for the foreseeable future? In the near term, absolutely. They've shown their willingness to lash out at ship traffic through the strait.…From: this video · 1 claim mined from it
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +8.7% · 68.69 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…pricing that the Fed might be too tight. So stay tuned for that. We're on guard. So next chart. Here is the oil price on a year-over- year basis. It's based on a three-month moving average. And so you can see right now on that basis, we're into the 50s on a year- over-year basis. But look at the X. The X shows you where we are on a year-over-year basis, point to point, this time last year versus today. And most of that inflation is out, and as Hormuz opens up more and more, we think the oil price could drop precipitously, especially as transportation is going electric. And it's not just robo-taxis, it's trucks, it's drones. So at the margin, we think the case for oil is diminishing, meaning the bull case for oil is diminishing quite significantly. And we would not be surprised to see a general deflationary world for oil in the next few years. So on this chart, you can see the commodity price index.…From: this video · 4 claims mined from it
“I tend to think we hover around this kind of 70, 75 level” (crude); notes “right now estimates have a surplus of about 4 million barrels a day for 2027”
WTI crude since this was said: ▲ +7.4% · 69.50 → 74.66 · as of 2026-08-05
…kind of closer to that $70 level in TI, maybe 65. I tend to think having read the headlines again this morning that India says they're going to increase their strategic petroleum reserves. China has some rebuilding of stockpiles to do. India also wants to diversify away from Middle Eastern crude. I tend to think that's a scenario we're anticipating this massive surplus , but what it's going to be is a rebuild in the market might not reflect quite as loose as that number kind of headline number would say. So I'm not thinking that we see this dramatic 60s, 50s crude scenario next year, which I know some analysts are pointing to. I tend to think we hover around this kind of 70, 75 level. - What has the OFAC waivers done for this market? The fact of the matter is a running crude could flow freely at market price. - This has been a huge factor, not just the OFAC, but the fact that you can transact in dollars, I think has opened up a lot of Iranian crude to the market. Now, what I haven't seen is a tremendous amount of buying outside of China of Iranian crude, but what that does essentially is make Iranian crude available to places like India, which has significantly reduced their imports due to the sanctions and makes it a more competitive barrel…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
Asked where a summer surprise could come from. She cites drawn-down global reserves and a coming rebuild cycle; earlier: 'oil prices are still high and I actually think we'll go higher' @1:28, and 'we have an allocation to energy in our portfolios as a hedge' @22:14.
“I think the thing that I struggle with is that like it seems to be hiding in plain sight Which is the fact that I think it's a rational Thing that oil could get to 150 160”
Piggybacking on Guild's oil call: 'I would not underestimate... everybody just went through this shock Where where inventories were put in jeopardy. The first thing they're gonna do is build those inventories' @22:36-22:50. He also flags rates: 'rates are telling you what what this market is thinking And we're gonna have to rationalize that at some point' @23:07.
“when you do get that if you do get that price appreciation It's not gonna come down quickly because they're gonna make sure that these inventories are Able to support them in times of turmoil”