Where does the index end the year? Targets and earnings math, with the drawdown warnings that come attached.
The count, last 30 days: 52 bull, 21 bear. The tape leans bull. A count, not a verdict.
The tape vs the talk
The line is S&P 500, last 90 days. Each dot is a claim as it landed on the tape: filled is bull, outlined is bear. Tap a dot to read it. Where the tape went after is context, not a verdict.
The tape
Jun 29
Jul 06
Jul 13
Jul 20
Jul 27
Aug 03
bullbearclaims filed per week
Where the numbers land
as of 2026-08-05 (updated with the morning fetch). Filled dots are claims on the record (tap one); outlined dots are model or scenario numbers. Not investment advice.
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
Bull2026-08-05
S&P 500 back at record high, Dow at 54,000; Murray argues the 20%+ one-year return is 'entirely an earnings driven rally,' not multiple expansion.
So actually, over the last 12 months, you've seen S&P forward PE go down by 12 percent and earnings go up by 34 percent.
Carlyle posted its highest quarterly earnings in almost four years on PE exits; AUM $485B, record $97B dry powder; asked whether the exit 'dam' has broken.
So for us, it's more of the same. Capital markets are open. It's a good environment and we're finding great opportunities to exit and to invest.
Host notes public-market spreads widening, concentrated in tech, with the Fed not cutting and possibly hiking; Plouffe recalls the predicted default wave when rates first rose never materialized.
So I'd say it's bifurcated. If you look at our markets outside of software, spreads are actually relatively tight still. They're coming off of all-time tights, but I would characterize those capital markets as very open to do business, and new deals can get done very well. Software's a little bit different. It's more difficult to get deals done in the software space.
His comment sends stocks soaring at the open - Dow up 678 points to a fresh record led by Caterpillar (+11%) - while Trump warns Iran the talks are the last chance to end the war and U.S. crude trades below $78.
I think there is a chance we may have a deal today or tomorrow to open the Strait and move towards a more normalized position in this conflict.
Asked if the 'frothy factor' and AI concern have played out; her skew-inversion monitor (count of S&P stocks with call vol outweighing put vol) fell from highs near 80 to about 50 after last week's 'situational awareness' shakeout.
So about average levels that tells you froth has been sucked out of the market. However, as we get past this earning season, August tends to be a volatility vacuum. And then we hit into midterms. I would expect some of that to reoccur.
Year-end S&P target 8,250 now fairly conservative (whisper garbles year-end as urine). Identity: title + the 8,250 target matching his registered house call. EVENT: will, dated year-end.
It's going higher. I mean, my urine forecast is 8,250. And all of a sudden, that looks fairly conservative. It's only six and a half percent away.
Forward earnings above $400 by year-end; 400 x 20 = 8,000 with upside on both terms. EVENT: will, dated.
It's an all-time record high. I think it's going to hit over $400 a share by the end of the year, which will be the expectations for next year. Take 400 times 20, and you've got 8,000 pretty reasonable estimates. I think earnings are going to be somewhat better, and the valuation multiple may be higher. So I'm feeling pretty comfortable with that, yes.
2027 one of the best years; 2026 closes above 8000 per affirmed host recap. EVENT: will, dated.
Yes, yeah, I think because as we start to look at 2027, there's a lot of the clouds that are heading this year kind of lift. You know, the SpaceX unlock will be behind us, and the market testing of the new Fed will be behind us, so I think... And then, of course, there's already been a leverage unwind, so I think 2027 could be one of the best years for the stock market.
Pins the Korea crash on the ~45B-levered-to-150B unwind plus copycats.
I think it was a big factor, because as you know, Korea is basically two companies, Samsung and Heineck, so it's memory and semis. He, of course, had a very large following, so not only was his leverage on his $45 billion, let's say it was leveraged to $150 billion, but there was a lot of money piggybacking on his trade, so I think in some ways, you know, the unwind, and even last week was due to a lot of funds being aware that he might have been in trouble.
Coiled spring after the AI unwind; S&P ~7800 this month, confirmed 'Yeah, for the S&P'. EVENT: will, August 2026.
the stock market's kind of a coiled spring, and then we had a huge deleveraging, as you're talking about, because of the AI unwinding Korea's policymakers panicking. So I think the markets could actually rebound strongly this month. Like, maybe we get to $7,800.
War, energy and rates not enough to destabilize a market backed by the strongest earnings quarter in five years.
I just think the market is resilient. I mean look at the headwinds. It's shrugging off the Iran war energy costs and Now a little rise in interest rates or a medium rising interest rates But I don't think those headwinds are enough to destabilize the market
With Treasuries above 5 percent, IG credit at 5-7 percent beats equities risk-adjusted, pressuring stretched AI valuations.
I agree with Freiburg about the fact that when you can get 5%, 5.25% from the U.S. government, there's another natural thing that happens, which is that investment grade corporates actually have better credit ratings now than the government of America, which that's a different thing, but you can get really good risk adjusted returns that are 5%, 6%, 7%, which adjusted for taxes are, you know, better than equity returns, meaningfully better on a risk parity basis.
second-half outlook despite the Middle East conflict
“we're very constructive in equity markets. I think we just have to understand there's going to be a bit of choppiness going forward throughout the year”
tentative shift from high-beta winners to higher-quality stocks
“perhaps this is a turning point and maybe an inflection where this where where the market mood begins to swing somewhat towards a more defensive posture”
On the coming tech earnings run led by Alphabet. He sees a repeat of last quarter, when 'extraordinary profits from the hyperscalers' broke the market out of geopolitical and rate worries, and calls the recent semi weakness 'a little bit of consolidation and a little bit of churn' @54:34; adds 'we'll just sort of have to wait and see' @54:46.
“My bias is that those results will be solid and set these sort of trends higher once again.”
Kyle Rodda · Capital.com (senior market analyst); name garbled by whisper, verify · Bloomberg ↗
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.2% · 7,499 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
Asked how many basis points of yield would make bonds attractive again, with the 30-year at 5.13 percent and the 10-year near year highs. He notes 'levels above 5% on the US 10 year are things that we've highlighted in the past, create a certain feedback from the bond market to the equity' @32:07, but hedges: 'There's a lot of other drivers, it depends why they go above 5%, depends how fast' @32:25, recalling that in the tech bubble yields above 6 percent coexisted with fine equity markets. He also worries about 'another wave of inflation risk' if the Middle East conflict continues @28:11.
“So the closer you get to 5% and the higher above 5% you get, the more likely it is actually that equity struggle with that.”
Pushed on Jamie Dimon's caution, he answers that bank leaders 'think about risk through a different lens than long-term investors' @0:21. Despite Mag 7 down, software disruption and a semi pullback, 'the market is near all-time highs because we are seeing a broadening' @1:09; 'Almost 90 percent of companies are beating expectations' @1:36, though misses 'are likely to see a lot of downside' @1:49.
“Well, I think if you look, yes, there are pockets of froth, but we're seeing a very healthy broadening in this market.”
Stephen Parker · J.P. Morgan Private Bank (co-head of Global Investment Strategy) · CNBC ↗
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.2% · 7,499 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
Given up only after the host needles 'You don't have a target?' @6:32; host jokes 'I wouldn't do that, but you just did it anyway' @6:43. Implies continued upside into year-end 2026 and mid-2027.
“We think that by the end of the year, our base case target is 7,800 and 8,200 for the middle of next year.”
Stephen Parker · J.P. Morgan Private Bank (co-head of Global Investment Strategy) · CNBC ↗
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.2% · 7,499 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
Asked why he thinks the retail trading boom is sustainable (a Wall Street Journal headline that day cited him saying the stock trading boom is here to stay). He cites structural drivers: 'Gen Z is 45% more likely to invest by the age of 21 than the prior generation' @23:38, and zero commissions, which 'just took away the last barrier for investors' @23:49. Schwab reported a record 11.9 million daily average revenue trades in Q2.
“So I think it's all adding up to just more engagement. We've seen the highest level of stock ownership of stocks that we've seen in the last 20 years.”
Wrap-up question on the overall environment after Schwab's Q2. He adds 'But all in all, they're still bullish. They're buying on the dips. They're going into the AI stocks' @31:55, echoing his earlier data point that Schwab saw 'three and a half times more volume on down days in the market, which means that they're buying the dip' @22:33.
“I still think clients are bullish, but there is some caution and you do see them taking smaller positions than they normally would”
His long-running thesis: passive 401(k) flows are 'a continuous bid regardless of the underlying fundamentals' @0:34, hitting the largest stocks hardest and 'contributing to the concentration behavior we've seen in US equity markets' @2:12. Concludes the index 'is going to become more cyclical and lower quality and aggregate than it has historically been' @6:41.
“this is actually causing the equivalent of a perennial momentum bid into markets that has raised valuations dramatically.”
Cites S&P 500 up 10 percent YTD, Russell 1000 value beating growth, and 'Russell 2000, 20 percent returns' outperforming the S&P by 10 points @0:57. Says the Iran war should resolve into 'some sort of manageable relationship' with less oil volatility @1:46, and GDP 'continues to be strong above trend at two and a half percent' @1:57.
“we think that the market is giving us some interesting information here, which is that we'll see continued outperformance and strong GDP growth, which will help fuel earnings.”
Stockton says the Nasdaq 100 took out short-term support (50-day MA) last week and the 50-day is rolling over; the next real support is ~8-9% lower, and consolidations resolving downside bring volatility 'we're bracing for.'
“that does increase downside risk because the next support is pretty well below 8% or 9%.”
Stockton defines ~7340 (50-day MA plus her cloud model) as the S&P 500's equivalent support; a breakdown from its 'coiled' consolidation 'would probably be a drag on just about everything,' prompting top-down hedging of high-beta.
“We're putting that level right around 7340 for the S&P 500.”
Brent ~88-90 amid US-Iran war escalation, equities up Monday morning: 'The fundamental view in the marketplace is these escalations will be contained. And this was tested this weekend' (@2:32); the contrast of 'really messy news and relatively stable markets... You normally don't get that combination at all' (@2:56-3:04).
“So this is a fascinating time because everything is in equilibrium, but it's very unstable.”
Answering the host's point that about a third of S&P growth comes from Micron and Nvidia, he says market earnings expectations are vulnerable: 'the question is, is capacity going to overwhelm the demand for the market?' @5:45 and 'what happens after 2027?' @5:28. He owns Micron but has 'trimmed it back twice this year' @6:04.
“Yes, yes, it does. Because if you don't believe in those Micron earnings of $150, you're not going to get the kind of earnings growth the market is expected.”
About 50 companies had reported; he says banks 'reported fantastic numbers' and 'the consumer seems to be rather resilient' @0:57, with capital-markets activity helping. Host cites FactSet stats (88% beats, ~20% EPS growth): those are hers, not his.
“Now, looking to some of the other companies that are going to be reporting over the next several weeks, we're expecting a fairly strong earnings season.”
Jon Maier · J.P. Morgan Asset Management (chief ETF strategist) · CNBC ↗
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +4.0% · 7,443 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
Rebutting a montage of investors touting the broadening-out theme. He calls AI-adjacent buying second order concentration: that's not diversification, it's second order concentration @44:32, and If the AI trade sneezes, we're not catching a cold, we're getting pneumonia @44:53. Ed supports with data: top 10 stocks are 40 percent of the S&P, over half of Russell 2000 returns from AI-related names, 75 percent of EM-ex-China returns from TSMC, Samsung, SK Hynix.
“The market is not broadening. It's just finding new ways to buy Nvidia.”
Also: 'if you want to just go buy the S&P, I think you're going to get great returns in the S&P for at least the next couple of years as well.' @42:03. Cites 5-6% deficits ('the printing press is still happening'), a government that 'can't lose to China' on AI, hyperscalers' low debt-to-equity and ~$2T of contracted RPOs as reasons capex and earnings keep growing.
“I think between now and the end of the year at these levels, regardless of whether Micron sells off another 20%, I don't see how the memory trade, the earnings don't grow, and how the S&P doesn't go higher.”
'I actually believe that multiple compression story will become a much bigger story.' @45:03. Logic: if AGI arrives within ~3 years, commoditized intelligence lets AI-native competitors attack all public companies, so terminal values compress even as earnings grow: his answer to the 'we need a dot-com-style blowoff first' bulls.
“I think the market is going to go through multiple compression. So I think earnings are going to be great. I think the S&P is going to grow less than earnings like we've seen so far this year.”
'we still have plenty of wall to climb' @1:56; his proprietary sentiment-and-positioning index is 'still around neutral' vs the +1-2 standard-deviation froth threshold @2:31; 'about $8 trillion worth on the sidelines and that's ballooning' as dry powder @5:11. Notes the S&P 'is still trading around 7,500 and not too far off its all time highs' @3:29 despite the semi-momentum unwind he had cautioned on a month earlier; stellar bank earnings 'ratify my tech enablement thesis' with broadening leadership @3:46.
“we still have echoes and hints of structural fear, which means that there are incremental buyers on the sidelines waiting to power the next leg of this stock market rally.”
Window is pre-mega-cap earnings (Google Jul 22, Microsoft Jul 29, Meta ~Jul 29, Amazon Jul 30 as listed on tape): 'the nervousness for cash the dash for cash maybe or even the desire to take profits maybe so extreme that we could knock on the door of 675' @13:19. Hedged in real time: 'I'm not saying that's gonna be you know today who knows we could end up going green today.'
“we've been bleeding on the nasdaq 100 now where can we potentially go well unfortunately if this Iran drama keeps going my take is we could potentially head down to 675”
Iran's 'pickaxe mountain' enrichment site (Trump's comments moved up his 2-3-year worry) drove the downgrade, yet: 'longer term though still buying stocks' @21:03 and 'I expect to buy stocks and buy the different stocks between now and next week when earnings come out' @21:09. Reminds viewers he called the SpaceX-IPO '30% rise and then a bleed' which he says played out.
“I've actually reduced my level on the bull bear scale because of the pickaxe mountain comments”
From Carson's just-released mid-year outlook 'Still Riding the Wave.' Basis: 'This is the eighth longest bull market since World War II' @0:29; of the prior seven, 'only one of them didn't make it to their fourth birthday' @0:36; this one is about 3.5 years old vs an average length of about eight years. 'Carson Group, we've been pretty bullish for a while now' @0:23. This is the title claim.
“We're not saying it's gonna go eight years, but we are saying, we're saying for a while, this bull market might be younger than you think.”
Cites cooler US inflation, the Bank of Canada's sixth straight hold at 2.25%, and solid JPMorgan/Goldman earnings as interconnected supports. Tempered by: expect volatility this earnings season since 'expectations are high... 23% year-over-year growth... in the tech sector... 65%' @6:33.
“now today with Taiwan Semiconductor kicking off the earnings season with really strong expectations for the AI build out and that's underpinning the AI trade as well. So we're optimistic for the second half of this year.”
BlackRock earnings-day interview (record results on tape); margins +260bp over 12 months on technology; 'not that much leverage in this compared to 2008, 2009', crypto leverage already washed out
“I'm very bullish on the markets over the next 12 months.”
Notes almost all Mag 7 stocks fell 'close to at least 20% from their highs' yet 'the S&P is 1% away from a record high' because memory names subbed in (@2:58); adds Nvidia 'is now trading cheaper than the S&P 500 on a forward earnings basis' (@3:19).
“Well, we think a rotation is going to happen back into the Mag Seven, into large cap tech. And that's going to be the catalyst that takes the S&P to $8,000.”
'I do think earnings season is going to be healthy' (@16:33) and 'I don't think that we're slowing down this AI train anytime soon' (@17:09), but expects volatility 'through summer and maybe even into early fall' on the new Fed chairman and midterm rhetoric.
“So the market tends to peak before earnings peak. So earnings could continue to be very, very strong, even with a market that's moving sideways.”
On chips and mega caps he says 'it comes down to QQ earnings. That's really going to be the flash line in the dark tunnel' @2:16 (whisper garbles 'Q2' and 'flashlight'), calls the hyperscalers 'mostly in the penalty box' @2:33, and 'the demand storage still early' @2:44. 'Capbacks' is a whisper garble of capex.
“15 to one demand the supply. This AI revolution is still third inning, but the hyperscalers, those are the ones, the ones that are funding the AI party, funding the capbacks.”
Dan Ives · Yorkville Ives & Co (per Bloomberg plate Jul 2026; formerly Wedbush) · CNBC ↗
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.2% · 7,572 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
Extended Squawk Pod version of the Jul 14 interview; mechanism: a competitor with a cheap barrel of intelligence can attack any incumbent, so markets stop paying for 20 years of cash flows; 'worth some multiple of the first five to seven years only' (@56:14)
“the multiples of free cash flow of all these public companies are going to come way in”
Her framing of what a real bear case requires; she does not expect the AI earnings crack
“if you really want to get bearish on the market, you have to get bearish on earnings. It's not just enough to be worried about valuation pressures. And you have to attack that AI earnings story.”
“You take technology or the big tech companies out of the earnings growth picture, and you're not even in double digit rates. That's hardly an earnings boom.”
“8,000 is doable this year… Because 8,000 would be roughly 20 times 2027 earnings of 400. I think that's a low estimate. I think the PE multiple could be 22 or better”; and: “between now and year end, there should be something that might feel like a bear market too. Not in July, but maybe between August and October”
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…. You weren't really impressed with June that much in terms of the averages kind of stalling out, and you expect July to be better as val uations are more reasonable and sentiment is not crazy bullish. Does that sum things up? Yeah. I mean, in July, we're going to get Q2 earnings. Right. And in the first quarter, earnings came in way better than expected. And so the market's PE is actually lower now than it was in January by one point, one full turn. And I think second quarter earnings are going to surprise to the upside again. So the market's going to get cheaper again. And that means there's room for PE to expand. So I think July is going to be a stronger month for stocks. 8,000 is doable this year. Yes. The S&P. Yeah. Because 8,000 would be roughly 20 times 2027 earnings of 400. I think that's a low estimate. I think the PE multiple could be 22 or better. So that would be even 84, 80, 800 kind of would be the upside into your end. But I do think between now and year end , there should be something that might feel like a bear market too. Not in July, but maybe between August and October. Why not in July? Well, I think Joe cited that June wasn…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
“We upped our target a little bit to 81.50 [8,150]. Healthy, not heroic” (12-month-forward target); “on the high end, some of our models are signaling more than 8300 [8,300]”
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…starting to percolate there, and interest from clients starting to percolate as well. At some point, we'll deal with 2027 earnings growth expectations. We're not there yet. We're still sorting through 2026, but that's something to keep on your radar as well. And it feels like interest rate fears have eased back a little bit, but that's something also to keep on our radar. I know there's just a whole range of outcomes predicted around the street right now, some people looking for cuts, some people looking for hikes. But we do keep that hike risk on the radar. But Tom, with the price target, we try to be longer term. We've recast it this year from a December 31st number to a 12-month forward number. We update it once a month. We did a little bit later last month, and we probably should have. But we had a number of events to get through. And so we upped our target a little bit to 81.50. Healthy, not heroic. We still think that the earnings strength, the earnings tailwind, is offsetting pressures on the PE from the trickier rates and inflation environment. So no real change. What is the AI theme in your work these days? I guess we all started our own AI investing by just buying the chips, which is still a way to go, no doubt. But is there other ways to play AI that you and your team are thinking about? So I think it started out as sort of a Mag 7 type story. And then we saw in the earnings data that the AI trade was really sort of broadening out this year. And then the semis were front and center. And we were kind of at peak revisions there on earnings. You've had expensive valuation.…From: this video · 1 claim mined from it
“The cost of capital has now with long term rates moved back to what its long run average is, which is around eight to 11 percent. The problem is that half of large U.S. companies now cannot deliver returns that exceed that.”
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…but I want to be able to protect myself in doing so. And then the second is I want the flexibility where there's an independent third party control plane that I use to get all these benefits so that I don't leak and cede my advantages away. And I think Alex is an incredible, smart, brilliant guy, and he completely nailed it. And I think he called out on its face the huge risk of this. So let me just give you this narrative in three tweets. The first one is I read this really interesting study from BCG and what they looked at was the return on capital employed or ROCE of various businesses. And this is what's incredible. The cost of capital has now with long term rates moved back to what its long run average is, which is around eight to 11 percent. What that means is like that is the actual cost that you would borrow money at effectively. The problem is that half of large U.S. companies now cannot deliver returns that exceed that. That is a really big problem. And then second, there's a further problem, which is that persistently low returns. So in the, you know, one, two, three, four, five percent is about one in seven companies all around the world. Okay. So why is this important to note? It means that being in business is complicated. It's hard. Not everything works all the time.…From: this video · 12 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…expansion globally. Fed was going to lower interest rates. Oil costs were low rates were low. It was a very nice backdrop. We ran into the war in Iran which disrupted things momentarily disrupted the broad ening out trade. Confident now that we 've seen oil prices come down significantly. In flation expectations down rates down that we've got a nice macro backdrop and the broadening of these markets should continue. Yeah the biggest story really so far has been this broadening that we've been seeing small caps having their best first half in decades . The Dow I think it's the best first half in five years. Do you expect that to be kind of a temporary broadening or is that is this a new phase of the bull market. I would categorize it as a new phase of the bull market. I mean we've always known that these parts of the market are cheaper. The question is do you have a catalyst for them to outperform. And so those catalysts which are better growth globally and some of that's fiscal stimulus in most parts of the world. Also declining energy prices is helpful. You 'd like to see some policy easing. I'm not sure we're going to get all the way there with the Fed but I think if they stay on hold that's enough of a catalyst. And I think one of the things that people underestimate is you've seen a lot of bidding up of the companies that are bringing us a market starting to think about some of the bigger beneficiaries of that. Smaller cap…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…divisions to focus on growth, all expected to be completed within a year. Joining us now to talk about markets and the macro story is Alianz's Chief Economic Advisor Wharton Professor and Gramercy Funds Management Chairman, Mohammad El-Arian. Mohammad, great to see you. Thanks for having me. Thank you so much for being here. So here we are at the beginning or let 's say the end of the first half, the beginning of the second half of the year, how do you see things? How would you assess markets and the macro story? So it's been a great second quarter. I think if we were here three months ago and we had suggested that NASDAQ would be up 20%, people say there's a war going on, what are you thinking? But that's the reality and it shows you the strength of the tech led innovation led economy that we're living in. Going forward, I'm not worried about fundamentals. I think fundamentals are strong. I'm not worried about valuations that have adjusted its technicals. And in particular, there's a tug of war going on right now between our ability to attract money from the rest of the world and this incredible condition to buy the dip versus a question of where will all these funds come from for all the needs that we have for our tech companies, for our government and everything else. So we're going to see the technicals play out, but fundamentals and val uations are in a really good place. You said that before, I mean, you've got lots of money that was flowing into America from the Middle East. I mean, the president likes to talk about the $18 trillion that he's…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…Great time to check in with Tom Lee, Head of Research at Fundstrat, Chief Investment Officer of Fundstrat Capital as well as the CNBC contributor . You weren't really impressed with June that much in terms of the averages kind of stalling out, and you expect July to be better as val uations are more reasonable and sentiment is not crazy bullish. Does that sum things up? Yeah. I mean, in July, we're going to get Q2 earnings. Right. And in the first quarter, earnings came in way better than expected. And so the market's PE is actually lower now than it was in January by one point, one full turn. And I think second quarter earnings are going to surprise to the upside again. So the market's going to get cheaper again. And that means there's room for PE to expand. So I think July is going to be a stronger month for stocks. 8,000 is doable this year. Yes. The S&P. Yeah. Because 8,000 would be roughly 20 times 2027 earnings of 400. I think that's a low estimate. I think the PE multiple could be 22 or better. So that would be even 84, 80, 800 kind of would be the upside into your end. But I do think between now and year end , there should be something that might…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +2.7% · 7,537 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…Let's bring in Stephanie Link, Chief Investment Strategist and Portfolio Manager for Hightower. Good morning. Also a CNBC contributor. Let's do it for the third time here, Stefan, and tell me whether it makes sense. Because, what's Forrest Gump saying? I 'm a lot of smart men. So 400 on the S&P for earnings in next year, 2027. If you take 20 times earnings, it's a round number. That's 8,000. Is that reasonable after the gains we 've already seen in the S&P? I think so, Joe, and I think it's because the economy is really healthy, led by the consumer, led by the AI revolution, and that's leading to a broadening out in the market into different sectors. Because it's not just technology that's going to benefit from AI and the revolution. It's a lot of other sectors are starting to do well. And in fact, last quarter, seven out of 11 sectors had double digit earnings growth, but technology took all the credit, right? So I think that we're going to continue to see a widening out of the market. I think you want to own tech, but you also want to own industrials, financial s, especially discretionary, with oil prices down 40% from the highs.…From: this video · 2 claims mined from it
“The high risk is the valuations are high. It has not mattered because earnings have been off the charts and the Fed has not been antagonistic” - H2: earnings exceed “nowhere near” H1's beat
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.5% · 7,483 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…My next guest, Wall Street Legend, knows how to sell through choppy waters , which could be the case in the second half of the year. I want to bring in now Bob Dahl, Cross mark Global, their CEO and CIO. Bob, so I saw your note, you're calling this a high risk bull market. What makes it high risk? The high risk is the valuations are high. It has not mattered because earnings have been off the charts and the Fed has not been antagonistic. Second half of the year, my guest's earnings might exceed but nowhere near the amount they exceeded in the first half and the Fed may become a little antagonistic. That I think needs to be factored in. It's going to be harder in the second half than the first half. Oh, man. Okay. With that being said, are there adjustments that should be made to portfolios now? What are some of the things that people should have top of mind in terms of things just don't go as smoothly in the second half? You just have to make sure you've got companies with reasonable valuations,…From: this video · 1 claim mined from it
▸ See the moment
Bull2026-07-02
Fundstrat raised S&P year-end target to 8,000 ($400 2027 earnings x 20 multiple) BUT expects a severe correction first; markets frontload negative shocks
Tom Lee · Fundstrat Global Advisors · Prof G Markets (yt kL3CAFG5MiI
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.5% · 7,483 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.5% · 7,483 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…Because you're right, fundamentals are quite good. Expectations are even higher in some cases. We think the market does go higher. But some choppiness, some pullbacks, some repricing risk, it all makes sense . But see, I ask you this every time, Tom , you're with me, because people, they hear you and they assume that you're always bullish, and directionally, you are, with the caveat this time of you still are expecting a meaningful pullback in stocks at some point before another significant ramp up into the end of the year. And you haven't changed that, have you? And I ask you every time. Yeah. And again, I think we're still in this up phase. So I think near term, I think we can be 77, 7,800 first. And then a 10% to 15% pullback, but for understandable reasons. Because the Fed is something the market 's trying to understand. And we've got an unlock of a major IPO coming. And there's cumulative shortages now in petroleum products that becomes a pricing risk later this year. But I do think the earnings momentum is very strong, and investors are still offsides. In fact, fund managers are having one of the worst years, actually in almost five years. This is one of the worst years for growth managers. And so I think they're going to buy that dip. Are we vulnerable to something like that? I think the pullback, I think Tom's right. But I think the pullback comes from a higher level, right? We're still looking at the fundamentals . We're still looking at credit.…From: this video · 1 claim mined from it
“We got a lot of upside to analysts' expectations. We think we're going to get a lot of upside this quarter, and absolutely 30% is possible… tech and the AI names are going to drive about 60%, maybe 65% of that earnings growth”
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.5% · 7,483 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…V-shaped recoveries. It's always been met with a lot of skepticism. Even earlier this year, we had said that the pullback associated with the war would be a V- shaped recovery. >> You did say that, yeah. >> Yeah, and many don't believe it because they would point to oil and all these uncertainties. But I think what I've realized is markets front load on negative shocks. So that's why I think we could have a very severe correction. But unless the economy is breaking, so we actually have a negative cycle, I think that the yield curve will tell us and spreads will tell us, corporate credit spreads. But as long as the economy isn't breaking, whatever correction we have will be V- shaped. I know I'm saying something that sounds mechanical. Of course, it'll be put to the test, but that would still be my default belief. >> It seems as though the market has been getting more and more V-shaped. When we look at just how short these recoveries have been, the war was a perfect example. You did say at the beginning of the year, you thought that we would see a bear market like correction and then a whips aw back. That is what we saw, but it just came in the form of a strange thing, which was going to war with Iran. Looking at your favorite sectors right now for the year, you have energy, small caps,…From: this video · 8 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.5% · 7,483 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…Small caps. More upside in the second half. The Dow or NASDAQ. Dow. Russell or S&P 500. Russell. AI hardware or software. Software. Industrials or tech industri als staples or consumer discretionary discretionary financials or health care. Both. Financials. Real estate or private credit. Real estate. Bigger risk. Geopolitics or inflation inflation. One word to describe the U.S. economy. Res ilient. Straight of her move is resolved by your end or ongoing risk. Resolved. Oil by your end . Higher or lower than 70. Lower. One word for the second half. Productive S& P 500 price target by your end. Eight thousand. Brian Levitt the speediest this or that I think that we've ever had. You certainly are the champion there. That's Brian Levitt Chief Global Market Strategist Evan Ves co. Thank you so much. Thank you. If you enjoyed this street talk check out our full interview with Gareth Soloway. He explains why he expects an over 20 percent pullback for the S&P 500 by your end. He has a fifty six hundred price target.…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
S&P 500 since this was said: ▲ +3.2% · 7,499 → 7,742 · as of 2026-08-05
…Joining us now is Megan Shue, Wilmington Trust Chief Investment Strategist, and Megan, I'm going to cut you some slack, Wilmington Trust, a lot of trust there, got to have a lot of trust in what you're doing, so I just think you probably have a more conservative overall viewpoint of how to manage money. It's got to be there, obviously, when you're at Wilmington Trust. But this is what got me. Our economic and market views have become more destructive, and we think it's an appropriate time to move to a modest overweight to equity risk. So all through this, we've been talking about the new highs, again, in these ridiculous outsized gains for the quarter. So through all of this, you haven't been overweight. You've just been market weight? Yeah, we've been fully invested. And if you think about the first quarter, we were really pretty sensitive to some downside risks to the economy, most notably the labor market. And I was probably on here at some point talking about private payrolls, ex-healthcare being in contraction in the first quarter. And we have never seen that outside of…From: this video · 3 claims mined from it
Asked if he loses sleep over seven companies dominating the S&P 500. He calls it 'the antithesis of what you're supposed to be getting' @20:25 and says index holders 'really don't have the diversification that they think they have and if they really want it They probably have to explore alternatives' @20:40.
“I don't think it's healthy. I don't think it's you know, I but there's been so much written about it”