Photo: Editorial (Option A policy, Jun 10, 2026) - owner-supplied
First call on the ledger
2 still on the clock. Quotes in curly quotation marks are verbatim; everything
else is a labeled paraphrase. Every call links its original source. Before you trust the call, check the record.
Since they said it
8 directional calls with a price to read (6 bullish, 2 bearish). 1 week later, with the call in 5 of 8; 1 month later, with the call in 4 of 5. Prices as of 2026-09-11. Three fixed windows, the same for every call, always shown together: one week, one month, three months after the first close that followed the tape. What the market did, not a score: a call can have a different horizon, and a view with no number or deadline is never graded here.
S&P 500 from 2026-06-29 to 2026-09-10 · ▲ bullish · ▼ bearish · dot = the close that day
Date
Market
Call
What was said
1 week
1 month
3 months
2026-08-12
from 7,799
S&P 500
Bullish
No, I think the market is going higher, and I think it's going higher on earnings.
I don't think we're going to have a recession, and I think earnings will continue to surprise to the upside, and that'll continue to drive the market higher.
And when you look at the S&P 500 and information technology, it looks nothing like what we had back in 1999 and 2000. So all of a sudden, all this talk about this being a tech bubble is kind of thrown out the window.
Yardeni tells Lake there will be no recession, earnings keep surprising up and the stock market keeps going higher.
I don't think we're going to have a recession, and I think earnings will continue to surprise to the upside, and that'll continue to drive the market higher.
Yardeni tells Lake the long-feared US debt debacle has not happened in 45 years and buyers showed up at 5%, so he does not expect one.
But I've been doing this for over 45 years. And over that entire period, people have been worrying about a debt debacle. And it just hasn't happened so far.
Yardeni tells Lake supply-shock inflation may prove transitory but the Fed cannot afford to assume so after losing credibility in 2021.
And so it may turn out to be relatively transitory, but I didn't know that the Fed can take a chance on that the way they did in 2021 and lost some of their credibility
Yardeni tells Lake the Fed under Warsh should hike a quarter point in September to protect its credibility.
And so I think the Fed's credibility is on the line again. And I think they should move in September. I mean, a quarter point is going to do more for the credibility than it's going to hurt the economy.
Yardeni tells Lake $1.5-2tn deficits and over $1tn of interest payments are currently stimulating the economy.
the government has been spending, you know, one and a half to two trillion dollars worth of deficits. We're spending over a trillion dollars just on interest income.
Yardeni tells Lake the economy is doing very well on consumer, capex and deficit spending, though some growth is borrowed from the future.
and you've got an economy that's doing very well. But some of it could be borrowing from the future for sure. And some of it is ongoing resilience of the economy today.
Yardeni tells Lake boomers not selling constrains housing supply, so US home prices keep rising.
I mean, the Baby Boomers, they're not selling their houses. They're not moving into smaller apartment buildings. As a result, the supply of housing is rather constrained. And so home prices are going up.
Yardeni tells Lake investors will buy Treasuries at 5% and auctions are going fine, so deficit fear is overdone.
but we did see that there are investors will buy bonds of 5%. I think it's important to realize that as long as the bond auctions are going reasonably well
Yardeni tells Lake this week's CPI (nowcast ~0.29% m/m) will not be a shock in either direction.
I think they're looking for a number like point zero point two nine or something like that. I don't think it's going to be a shocker either to the upside or the downside.
Yardeni tells Lake Warsh has committed to 2% inflation and will owe an explanation if core CPI stays near 3%.
So he's kind of committed himself to get inflation down to two percent. And if the next CPI number remains closer to three percent, especially when you take out food and energy, then he's got an explaining to do.
Year-end S&P target 8,250 now fairly conservative (whisper garbles year-end as urine). Identity: title + the 8,250 target matching his registered house call. EVENT: will, dated year-end.
It's going higher. I mean, my year-end forecast is 8,250. And all of a sudden, that looks fairly conservative. It's only six and a half percent away.
Forward earnings above $400 by year-end; 400 x 20 = 8,000 with upside on both terms. EVENT: will, dated.
It's an all-time record high. I think it's going to hit over $400 a share by the end of the year, which will be the expectations for next year. Take 400 times 20, and you've got 8,000 pretty reasonable estimates. I think earnings are going to be somewhat better, and the valuation multiple may be higher. So I'm feeling pretty comfortable with that, yes.
Semis cheap, tech at a market multiple; categorical rejection of the 1999-2000 parallel.
And when you look at the S&P 500 and information technology, it looks nothing like what we had back in 1999 and 2000. So all of a sudden, all this talk about this being a tech bubble is kind of thrown out the window.
Trackable sector stance: OW financials, industrials, health care; market-weight tech.
Absolutely. We've been recommending market weighting information technology since the end of last year. And I think on balance, that's actually worked out reasonably well. We've been recommending over weighting financials, industrials and health care. And that's worked out very well.
“We thought he was a dove who favored lowering the federal funds rate. Instead, he hammered home a strict orthodox message on inflation with a strong commitment to price stability” (his written note, read on air); “it may be a do nothing Fed for a while”