4 correct, 11 missed; 4 too vague to score. Quotes in curly quotation marks are verbatim; everything
else is a labeled paraphrase. Every call links its original source. Before you trust the call, check the record.
Since they said it
12 directional calls with a price to read (6 bullish, 6 bearish). 1 week later, with the call in 8 of 12; 1 month later, with the call in 5 of 12; 3 months later, with the call in 1 of 3. Prices as of 2026-09-10. Three fixed windows, the same for every call, always shown together: one week, one month, three months after the first close that followed the tape. What the market did, not a score: a call can have a different horizon, and a view with no number or deadline is never graded here.
Nasdaq from 2026-04-20 to 2026-09-10 · ▲ bullish · ▼ bearish · dot = the close that day
Date
Market
Call
What was said
1 week
1 month
3 months
2026-08-02
from 7,600
S&P 500
Bullish
I agree with Freiburg about the fact that when you can get 5%, 5.25% from the U.S. government, there's another natural thing that happens, which is that investment grade corporates actually have better credit ratings now than the government of America, which that's a different thing, but you can get really good risk adjusted returns that are 5%, 6%, 7%, which adjusted for taxes are, you know, better than equity returns, meaningfully better on a risk parity basis.
“The cost of capital has now with long term rates moved back to what its long run average is, which is around eight to 11 percent. The problem is that half of large U.S. companies now cannot deliver returns that exceed that.”
I think the low end of the market is basically finished. I think there is no safe space. I think the high end of the market, where Mark operates, where the large monoliths operate is quite safe.
Said Mar 5, 2026 · deadline Jun 12, 2026 (IPO leg); Jun 30, 2027 (merger leg)Missed
“I don't think SpaceX will IPO. I think it will reverse merge into Tesla. I think Elon will use it as a moment to consolidate control and power of his two seminal assets into one cap table.”
What happened: SpaceX completed a standalone Nasdaq IPO; first trade Jun 12, 2026 at $150.00. No Tesla reverse merger.
With Treasuries above 5 percent, IG credit at 5-7 percent beats equities risk-adjusted, pressuring stretched AI valuations.
I agree with Freiburg about the fact that when you can get 5%, 5.25% from the U.S. government, there's another natural thing that happens, which is that investment grade corporates actually have better credit ratings now than the government of America, which that's a different thing, but you can get really good risk adjusted returns that are 5%, 6%, 7%, which adjusted for taxes are, you know, better than equity returns, meaningfully better on a risk parity basis.
Frames the fork: duopoly holds means 5-10T each; open-source shift or token efficiency questions the premium.
if the answer is that it is a duopoly, then there is no risk to the revenue five to 10 years from now. These things are five to 10 trillion dollar companies each. But if you are right, or if there are harnesses that cut the token consumption because you stop wasting tokens to get to the same output, then it's a little bit more of a question mark.
All-In on the Situational Awareness blowup; asked about the chip-stock crash and the fund's margin call.
If I was going to give you one piece of advice when you're running risk is you have to manage leverage incredibly carefully because when it runs ahead of you, the unwind is incredibly violent and it's incredibly quick. [...] the rumors are he was running like three and a half turns [...] a 25 percent move is amplified 75 percent.
Chamath backs the SRO because 'a torrent of money' will try to buy regulatory capture on both political sides; establishing self-set rules and superseding federal oversight avoids a duopoly and killing open source.
“I think it's really important. And I hope it happens quickly.”
Chamath argues AI-native operators + capital (Stripe/Advent/Block for PayPal, Ryan Cohen/eBay, Bending Spoons rollups) will revive 'flaccid' founder-less digital businesses; he expects a big wave of such mega deals over the next couple years.
“I will make a prediction. I think that eBay and PayPal are probably the beginning of a wave of mega deals”
On the ~$53B ($60/share) Stripe-Advent-Block offer for PayPal, Chamath says the final price will be higher and hints a strategic ('$4-5 trillion market cap') bidder could enter.
“this is probably not the final clearing price. I think the price is probably another 10 to 15% higher from here.”
Building on Ramp CEO Eric Glyman's clip that token spend among Ramp customers grew 21x in a year, Chamath calls uncontrolled AI token spend 'a money burning furnace' that will eventually surprise CFOs.
“if things are 21Xing every few months, somebody's going to miss a quarter. I don't know who, but somebody.”
Chamath says the US is 'massively short electrons,' citing a PJM auction that sought 7-8 GW but drew only ~156 MW, and Elon's behind-the-meter turbine workaround; he frames power as the binding constraint on AI.
“By 2050, the United States of America will be 2.5 California's worth of energy in deficit.”
His oil analogy for frontier token pricing: OpenAI also $26, Anthropic's latest $56, Elon $1, Zuck $1.50, Demis and Sundar $1, 'The Chinese will sell it to you for $0.50. So this rationalization has to happen.' (@2:10); explicitly declines the host's invite to call an LLM break; discloses his seat: 'My entire job is selling enterprise opportunities.' (@0:24)
“Let's say a barrel of intelligence, which is a million tokens. You can buy that barrel for $26 from Anthropic's really good model.”
'The CEOs and the CFOs, in my opinion, probably have no idea how much token maxing is going on inside of their organizations.' (@3:20); 'if you see a bunch of public companies in the next few quarters miss because of an OpEx miss' the market discounts that technology (@5:07); said the day IBM's prelim revenue wiped out $69B, the most since at least 1968 (Bloomberg tape @14:24)
“I suspect what will happen is one day you're going to have a miss, and EPS will be off by a few pennies. And the CEO will say to the CFO, what happened?”
Extended Squawk Pod version of the Jul 14 interview; mechanism: a competitor with a cheap barrel of intelligence can attack any incumbent, so markets stop paying for 20 years of cash flows; 'worth some multiple of the first five to seven years only' (@56:14)
“the multiples of free cash flow of all these public companies are going to come way in”
Discloses long exposure via Founders Fund/Swarm history; sees industrial logic in SpaceX acquiring Tesla (fair premium 'probably a 50% premium' given lawsuit risk); 'The spectrum he bought from Charlie Ergen I think is going to get lit up' (@54:28); self-labels the phone-device call as speculation
“tens of millions of people all around the world that will pay him incrementally for that. I think that is what's being slept on. That is the key asset.”
Bezos-camp answer on tape; cites Disney animators 10x after Pixar, radiologists multiplying after Khosla's call, chauffeur drivers 2x after Uber; on Dario: 'very deeply afraid... they've just been wrong consistently'; 'the sky is not falling' (@48:05)
On the 5% Billionaire Tax Act ballot measure (Nov); says roughly a trillion dollars of wealth has already left ('it's in the neighborhood'); founders with paper valuations get unpayable bills; he personally stays and pays
ADVICE TO THE LABS, not investor sell advice: IPO now, 'at a huge price', before the token-cost reckoning he describes becomes visible; his own CTO's numbers (costs doubling every 45 days, ~5% productivity gain) are the setup
“So I suspect that if you can get out now, you should get out now before all of that starts to seep into the water table.”
“At some point, you're going to have to show an ROI that's above the risk free rate of return. Otherwise, you're going to have some angry investors on your hands.”
“The cost of capital has now with long term rates moved back to what its long run average is, which is around eight to 11 percent. The problem is that half of large U.S. companies now cannot deliver returns that exceed that.”
Chamath Palihapitiya tells the All-In audience that compute plus recursive self-learning could deliver an order-of-magnitude model improvement per year, a new Moore's law (hedged 'potentially').
You can potentially live out this idea that there is an order of magnitude improvement on a yearly basis.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that Amazon warehouses run 35-40% labor churn, evidence those jobs are not worth protecting from robots without asking the workers.
Amazon has 35% or 40% churn inside of their warehouses.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that China being under nine months behind the US in AI is a good thing because it enables detente; he wants KYC on frontier models rather than broad regulation.
I think it's actually good that China is less than nine months behind us.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that the domain-specific-accelerator shift he expected after the Groq deal is instead happening inside Nvidia via co-design with every lab.
but the reality is that that DSA market evolution is actually happening inside of Nvidia.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that despite flashing macro signals there are pockets of the market worth owning for 10 years (five or fewer names) and everything else should not be speculated in.
I think there's pockets of the market that still make sense that you can underwrite if you wanna buy businesses that represent the future.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In the Trump-Xi trip was useful and productive, guessing real alignment on geopolitical next steps happened behind closed doors.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In the US should sell top chips to China so Nvidia keeps the market and Huawei never gets room to build a competitive chip.
Number two, sell the chips. And the reason we should sell the chips is we want Nvidia to win. We do not want to give enough oxygen for Huawei to then all of a sudden emerge and have a version of a chip that works
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that low-end SaaS is finished while large incumbents like Salesforce are safe because enterprise AI deployment is proving hard.
I think the low end of the market is basically finished. I think there is no safe space. I think the high end of the market, where Mark operates, where the large monoliths operate is quite safe.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that large-cap enterprise software is oversold and can re-rate upward; the opposite trade is incumbents with strong net dollar retention.
I think we're a little, I think we're a little oversold. And I now I think this consolidation and the rerating can happen in the opposite direction.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that once markets ask for the ROI on $3T of AI spend, AI-lab revenue multiples will come way down while incumbent software multiples recover.
So I think you're going to see these revenues, which are like way out of whack, like the multiples on revenue, multiples on assets, multiples of they're not even multiples of debt. Those will come way back down. And I think these go back up and you'll find a balance.
Chamath Palihapitiya tells All-In that once SpaceX, Anthropic and OpenAI go public there will be a wave of lawsuits among layered-SPV sellers; treats those IPOs as given (no date).
By the way, and I will guarantee you this, once SpaceX goes public, once Anthropic goes public, once OpenAI goes public, you're going to see a litany of these lawsuits back and forth between the purveyors of these SPVs.