The trillion-dollar IPO era: what the valuation proves, and to whom.
The count, last 30 days: 5 bullish, 4 bearish. The tape leans bullish. A count, not a verdict.
The tape
Jul 20
Aug 03
Aug 10
Aug 17
Aug 24
Sep 07
bullishbearishclaims filed per week
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
Neutralhedged · 2026-09-08
Peter Schiff guesses SpaceX and Tesla will probably end up as one company, while saying he does not know.
Well, they're probably going to end up being the same company, but I don't know.
Stephanie Link (Hightower) tells CNBC she bought SpaceX at the IPO and has kept buying after a ~30% pullback, accepting heavy capex because the company sees monetization within a year.
And I also bought SpaceX and I have been buying SpaceX. I bought it in during the IPO and it's pulled back about 30 percent.
David Sacks tells Calacanis Musk's compute clusters are a call option on becoming a frontier lab and a put option on selling compute to the frontier labs.
So that you can think of that as like the call option is to catch up and become a true frontier lab. But if he fails at that, he's got the put option of just selling the compute.
Gavin Baker tells Sacks and Calacanis that SpaceX investors ignore Grok even though it is Pareto-dominant on many measures, and should factor it into SpaceX's value.
Very few of these investors talk about Grok at all, and it is Pareto dominant on a lot of measures.
Tim Farrar of TMF Associates tells Prof G Markets that Rocket Lab and AST SpaceMobile had inflated valuations relative to their current businesses, now falling back alongside SpaceX.
Well, I think both Rocket Lab and AST had got very inflated valuations based on their current business.
Tim Farrar of TMF Associates tells Prof G Markets that terrestrial power and land solutions will improve, keeping orbital data centers and the space economy a small share of the market.
I'm bullish about what might happen on the ground. And so I think that inevitably means that what we do in space is going to tend to be limited to a small percentage of the overall market.
Kevin Paffrath says the change-of-control clause waiving operational milestones in Musk's 2025 Tesla award is brilliant optionality for Musk but 'kind of evil' relative to what shareholders thought they voted for.
In my opinion, this is, again, brilliant optionality by Elon, though it's kind of evil because it's not what shareholders really intended to vote on
Kevin Paffrath says if SpaceX overpays for Tesla so Musk can roll appreciated Tesla stock into more SpaceX ownership, SpaceX shareholders are the ones who get hurt.
to increase his SpaceX ownership at a high Tesla valuation is good for him, but not good for SpaceX shareholders.
Played clip of SpaceX CFO; $6.7B additional cloud revenue contracted, ramping from October.
of the third quarter. We've already contracted an additional six point seven billion dollars of cloud services revenue over a six month period that begins ramping starting in October of this year. We
Asked how Schwab is preparing for the August 6 SpaceX lockup expiry, two days after earnings, with the stock below its IPO price. Earlier he says the SpaceX IPO was 'The heaviest day of call volume we've ever seen in the history of the firm' @25:58 and 'The level of retail interest, I've never seen a level of retail interest like this in an IPO or anything.' @26:34.
“Yeah, the retail investor is still buying SpaceX. We still see volume and it's largely one sided.”
Asked directly about 'your decision not to fast track SpaceX inclusion in the S&P 500' @3:30. She says it followed a lengthy public consultation and was made 'with independence, with a lot of integrity' @4:10.
“the independent index committees at S&P DJI really made the decision to stick to the course, to stick to our methodologies, to not move on allowing these mega IPOs to enter on a fast track basis into the S&P 500.”
Re-up of his earlier call: I predicted that SpaceX would get a 25% pop on the first day of trading. That happened. And then I said it would get cut in half. We're down to 40% down from its highs @64:19. Catalyst cited: lockup expirations, We're about to see a ton of supply come online @64:40.
“So I'm just gonna hold to the prediction. It's gonna get cut in half and I could easily seeing it trading below $100 a share.”
Bailey attributes SpaceX's post-IPO ~35% drop to FOMO unwind (comparing the chart to Cerebras) and profit-taking as investors sell Micron/Intel, saying there's been 'no true fundamental change to the underlying thesis.'
“Starship delay was small on the margin. You should see a typical pullback, but that's not really, shouldn't equate to a 35% pullback.”
With SpaceX trading below its IPO price, Ives compares it to Amazon/Facebook post-IPO dead-money periods and lockup/indexing-driven volatility, while maintaining SpaceX is central to the AI 'fourth industrial revolution' long-term.
“it's hard to say fourth industrial revolution without SpaceX, but any company like a SpaceX, the valuation support is not there.”
Continuation of his 'SpaceX suckening' thesis: 'We said that SpaceX has a risk of being a top for the market, mostly because it's a liquidity suck, right?' @2:53: a ~$75-85B raise draining market cash; notes SpaceX bonds pay ~150bp over Treasuries vs ~80bp for other hyperscalers, stock 'tanked off of its highs' with Apple retaking most-valuable-company. On memory: 'we've priced in the selling out of memory hardware for the next year or two.'
“I'm still bearish memory and still bearish a SpaceX.”
Reaffirming his pre-IPO $62 fair value with SpaceX at ~$133 (down 40% from peak, below the $135 IPO price). Bull case worth $130-160 has 'only a 7% chance' @3:10; medium case ~$71 @3:21. On whether the stock keeps falling into lockup expiries: 'I think that seems likely' @5:52 (teaser duplicate of that exchange at 0:00). Street consensus he rebuts: 27 of 31 buys, $242 average target.
“I have a discounted cash flow model. We have forecasts out to 2045. We're discounting those today. So we're saying these shares are fundamentally worth $62 today, again, probability weighted.”
Despite his $62 fair value he expects a strong first public earnings print ('earnings August something, August 8th or 9th' @4:29), citing 'those rental agreements with Anthropic and Google... pretty nice chunks of revenue at low marginal cost' @10:38. On the full-year stock path he stays neutral: 'Honestly, I think it could go either way' @9:47, since 'there has to be more demand than supply for the stock to go up' @11:22.
“I expect the quarterly report to be glorious. We have pretty good growth rates for even for 2026.”
He replays his June 10 on-air prediction ('here is my prediction for what will happen tomorrow... SpaceX stock will immediately explode 25%' @2:01) and scores himself 'Almost two for two, we'll see' @2:20 as SpaceX hits an all-time low of $132.75, down 40% from peak. Reaffirmation on Jul 16 of the Jun 10 call; the six-month clock runs from ~Jun 11 IPO.
“my other prediction is that within six months, probably sooner, SpaceX stock will be cut in half. Why? Because the valuation makes no sense whatsoever.”
Asked why SpaceX gets no analyst bump as it hits post-IPO lows, Ives says long-term investors will treat this as 'speed bumps' @0:32 and that 'Space more and more is going to be a huge part of the AI revolution' @0:41, comparing the setup to Facebook's and Amazon's early public years.
“This is a 26-mile marathon. I think we're only in mile one or two.”
Clip runs as SpaceX falls to $135 for the first time, below its $150 IPO price from last month. He adds 'I just think it's the unwind of the momentum names that we're continuing to see' @1:19. 'Faith stop' is a whisper garble of 'faith stock'.
“I don't know if it's anything between SpaceX, other than SpaceX is a faith stop. Yes, tremendous business, but you can't value it, and we don't know when they'll be profitable.”
Discloses long exposure via Founders Fund/Swarm history; sees industrial logic in SpaceX acquiring Tesla (fair premium 'probably a 50% premium' given lawsuit risk); 'The spectrum he bought from Charlie Ergen I think is going to get lit up' (@54:28); self-labels the phone-device call as speculation
“tens of millions of people all around the world that will pay him incrementally for that. I think that is what's being slept on. That is the key asset.”
Visser says SpaceX deserves a premium for Musk's ability to build data centers through the bottlenecks.
I think the premium that should come for SpaceX is the ability of him to navigate the bottlenecks that we're seeing and be able to build these data centers
Visser says SpaceX is a richly valued current business plus a large call option on space stations/orbital data centers.
So I think SpaceX is really two companies. You're getting a put in it, which is the revenue that's coming in right now. It's still valued extremely rich, but then you're getting this massive call option on these other parts
Todd 'Bubba' Horwitz tells Kitco he is a believer in SpaceX and thinks it will be fine, while noting buyers are paying up for a company that does not make money.
And of course, when you're buying into a SpaceX, I mean, listen, I'm a believer. I think it'll be fine, but you're buying into the hole and you're buying into a company that does not make money.
Thomas Laffont tells the All-In Summit that within a few years Starlink will power a device enabling phone calls anywhere in the world, addressing the global telco profit pool.
I believe that within a few years, Starlink will power a device which will actually enable you to make a phone call anywhere in the world.
Thomas Laffont tells the All-In Summit that SpaceX's core Starlink business addresses a $200-400B global telco profit pool with a substantially better product.
What I do know is that the global profit pool of telco and service providers across the world is anywhere between $200 to $400 billion
Gavin Baker tells All-In that the $15B/yr Anthropic compute deal effectively quadruples SpaceX/xAI's AI revenue and the business can grow far faster than anyone expected three months ago.
But 15 billion, that means the AI business right there is going to quadruple. It has already effectively quadrupled.
Gavin Baker tells All-In that orbital compute will become reality, noting only outsiders to data centers and space are skeptical, and SpaceX is best positioned.
The only people who are skeptical of Orbital Compute are those people who are not involved in data centers or space. Google, Anthropic, Amazon, Nvidia. They are all very convinced that Orbital Compute is gonna be reality.