The trillion-dollar IPO era: what the valuation proves, and to whom.
The count, last 30 days: 7 bull, 7 bear. The tape is split. A count, not a verdict.
The tape
Jun 15
Jun 29
Jul 13
Jul 20
bullbearclaims filed per week
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
Bull2026-07-25
SpaceX long-term view. talking her book (ARK holder), disclosed
“We think this could become the most important company in”
Asked how Schwab is preparing for the August 6 SpaceX lockup expiry, two days after earnings, with the stock below its IPO price. Earlier he says the SpaceX IPO was 'The heaviest day of call volume we've ever seen in the history of the firm' @25:58 and 'The level of retail interest, I've never seen a level of retail interest like this in an IPO or anything.' @26:34.
“Yeah, the retail investor is still buying SpaceX. We still see volume and it's largely one sided.”
Asked directly about 'your decision not to fast track SpaceX inclusion in the S&P 500' @3:30. She says it followed a lengthy public consultation and was made 'with independence, with a lot of integrity' @4:10.
“the independent index committees at S&P DJI really made the decision to stick to the course, to stick to our methodologies, to not move on allowing these mega IPOs to enter on a fast track basis into the S&P 500.”
Re-up of his earlier call: I predicted that SpaceX would get a 25% pop on the first day of trading. That happened. And then I said it would get cut in half. We're down to 40% down from its highs @64:19. Catalyst cited: lockup expirations, We're about to see a ton of supply come online @64:40.
“So I'm just gonna hold to the prediction. It's gonna get cut in half and I could easily seeing it trading below $100 a share.”
Bailey attributes SpaceX's post-IPO ~35% drop to FOMO unwind (comparing the chart to Cerebras) and profit-taking as investors sell Micron/Intel, saying there's been 'no true fundamental change to the underlying thesis.'
“Starship delay was small on the margin. You should see a typical pullback, but that's not really, shouldn't equate to a 35% pullback.”
With SpaceX trading below its IPO price, Ives compares it to Amazon/Facebook post-IPO dead-money periods and lockup/indexing-driven volatility, while maintaining SpaceX is central to the AI 'fourth industrial revolution' long-term.
“it's hard to say fourth industrial revolution without SpaceX, but any company like a SpaceX, the valuation support is not there.”
Dan Ives · Yorkville Ives & Co (per Bloomberg plate Jul 2026; formerly Wedbush) · Yahoo Finance ↗
Continuation of his 'SpaceX suckening' thesis: 'We said that SpaceX has a risk of being a top for the market, mostly because it's a liquidity suck, right?' @2:53: a ~$75-85B raise draining market cash; notes SpaceX bonds pay ~150bp over Treasuries vs ~80bp for other hyperscalers, stock 'tanked off of its highs' with Apple retaking most-valuable-company. On memory: 'we've priced in the selling out of memory hardware for the next year or two.'
“I'm still bearish memory and still bearish a SpaceX.”
Reaffirming his pre-IPO $62 fair value with SpaceX at ~$133 (down 40% from peak, below the $135 IPO price). Bull case worth $130-160 has 'only a 7% chance' @3:10; medium case ~$71 @3:21. On whether the stock keeps falling into lockup expiries: 'I think that seems likely' @5:52 (teaser duplicate of that exchange at 0:00). Street consensus he rebuts: 27 of 31 buys, $242 average target.
“I have a discounted cash flow model. We have forecasts out to 2045. We're discounting those today. So we're saying these shares are fundamentally worth $62 today, again, probability weighted.”
Despite his $62 fair value he expects a strong first public earnings print ('earnings August something, August 8th or 9th' @4:29), citing 'those rental agreements with Anthropic and Google... pretty nice chunks of revenue at low marginal cost' @10:38. On the full-year stock path he stays neutral: 'Honestly, I think it could go either way' @9:47, since 'there has to be more demand than supply for the stock to go up' @11:22.
“I expect the quarterly report to be glorious. We have pretty good growth rates for even for 2026.”
He replays his June 10 on-air prediction ('here is my prediction for what will happen tomorrow... SpaceX stock will immediately explode 25%' @2:01) and scores himself 'Almost two for two, we'll see' @2:20 as SpaceX hits an all-time low of $132.75, down 40% from peak. Reaffirmation on Jul 16 of the Jun 10 call; the six-month clock runs from ~Jun 11 IPO.
“my other prediction is that within six months, probably sooner, SpaceX stock will be cut in half. Why? Because the valuation makes no sense whatsoever.”
Asked why SpaceX gets no analyst bump as it hits post-IPO lows, Ives says long-term investors will treat this as 'speed bumps' @0:32 and that 'Space more and more is going to be a huge part of the AI revolution' @0:41, comparing the setup to Facebook's and Amazon's early public years.
“This is a 26-mile marathon. I think we're only in mile one or two.”
Dan Ives · Yorkville Ives & Co (per Bloomberg plate Jul 2026; formerly Wedbush) · CNBC ↗
Clip runs as SpaceX falls to $135 for the first time, below its $150 IPO price from last month. He adds 'I just think it's the unwind of the momentum names that we're continuing to see' @1:19. 'Faith stop' is a whisper garble of 'faith stock'.
“I don't know if it's anything between SpaceX, other than SpaceX is a faith stop. Yes, tremendous business, but you can't value it, and we don't know when they'll be profitable.”
Discloses long exposure via Founders Fund/Swarm history; sees industrial logic in SpaceX acquiring Tesla (fair premium 'probably a 50% premium' given lawsuit risk); 'The spectrum he bought from Charlie Ergen I think is going to get lit up' (@54:28); self-labels the phone-device call as speculation
“tens of millions of people all around the world that will pay him incrementally for that. I think that is what's being slept on. That is the key asset.”