Foreclosures, affordability, and who is willing to call a bottom.
The count, last 30 days: 6 bullish, 3 bearish. The tape leans bullish. A count, not a verdict.
The tape
Jul 20
Jul 27
Aug 03
Aug 10
Aug 24
Sep 07
bullishbearishclaims filed per week
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
Bearish2026-09-09
Heath says a rising long end pushes mortgages up, real estate down and cost of capital higher across Western economies
So this affects everything, 30 year mortgages, real estate markets gonna go down, the affordability for the whole economy is gonna go up, cost of capital basically for not just the US, but I'd say kind of broader Western governments and industries are gonna go higher.
Paffrath says on his 10-year chart real estate is closer to the bottom while stocks are closer to the top, which is why he is bullish on real estate.
if the stock market, in my opinion, is closer to the top, my take, and this is sort of my 10-year thesis on my 10-year chart, then I think real estate is pretty well over here, closer to the bottom.
Kevin Paffrath tells viewers that sellers outnumbering buyers has no bearing on the direction of home prices.
oh my gosh, home sellers outnumber home buyers has no bearing, you know, just because that's happening. It has no bearing on what the potential is for the housing market in terms of pricing.
Matt Ingram says the slowdown in Australian mortgage applications is overblown and longer-term housing loan demand will be very strong, which supports CBA.
we think longer term housing demand is going to be very strong, and that's good for CBA as well
Yardeni tells Lake boomers not selling constrains housing supply, so US home prices keep rising.
I mean, the Baby Boomers, they're not selling their houses. They're not moving into smaller apartment buildings. As a result, the supply of housing is rather constrained. And so home prices are going up.
Developer teases unannounced corporate relocations to Miami. EVENT: will, undated.
So although we keep hearing about the ones that have been announced, there are many other corporate moves coming to Miami that have not been announced that are in the works. And at some point in the near future, we'll become public.
He backs the thesis with his own allocation: I have invested about half my net worth in buying really high-end homes in four of those five @53:22. Rationale is that income inequality will run unabated, concentrating wealth in the top 0.1 percent, plus psychic income and no daily scorecard vs public stocks. He concedes it partly violates his own diversification rule.
“I think anyone worth over $50 million is gonna have at least one home in one of five places, Dubai, London, Palm Beach, New York, or Aspen.”
Explaining June's pending-home-sales dip ('we got back to bombing Iran' @0:22 - headline risk). Builder sentiment fell to 34: 'We are now 15 months south of the reading of 40' @0:45 (50 = neutral); spec building is down, existing market 'frozen' by rate lock, and construction is 'consistently two to 300,000 workers short' @2:12. Only high-end/luxury holding up. This is the title quote.
“We've got way, the uncertainty in home building right now and uncertainty in home buying is really dragging down the market.”
Answer to whether contractors and developers will stay away from NYC because of Mayor Mamdani's new second-home tax (in effect this month, already hitting luxury sales per the host). 'We're going to drive wealthy families out of New York.' @3:20; 'This is rent control in a different guise.' @3:33; predicts flight 'across the river to New Jersey, or they're going to go up to Connecticut' @3:48, citing Rhode Island's 'Taylor Swift tax' as precedent.
“I do, I think it's going to have a trickle down effect. May start at 10 million, when's it going to be five million?”
'look at what happened when we dropped rates to 3%... It won't help you because you're still gonna pay more' (@25:51). Cites Warsh telling him rates look neutral 'everything but housing' (@23:49) and CNBC survey showing housing is the No. 1 issue for 18-34 year olds. Teaser duplicate at 20:31; in-context occurrence filed.
“Bring the rate down, that'll improve affordability. Not in a situation where we have a supply deficit, right?”
His three reasons the entry point is 'interesting today' (@23:33): relative value, fundamentals ('we have never really seen fundamentals this strong' in early recovery, @23:47), and 'a very durable recovery' (@23:55).
“Stocks are expensive relative to real estate. Real estate's down 25% relative to its peaks, pretty interest rate a cycle. Equities are up 60%. That's interesting to investors today.”
New apartment development 'in the last 15 years, hasn't been lower than it is today' while demand exceeds supply even in the Sun Belt (@29:00-29:52); 'it's never been cheaper... to rent than to own' (@28:12).
“I believe that industrial and residential will outperform retail, which has been the best performing sector over the last two years. But we do think that those three are going to produce good risk-adjusted returns for investors over the next five years.”
Fairweather tells Elson institutional investors are a symptom, not the cause, of US housing unaffordability.
I do not think that private equity or institutional investors are the reason why housing has gotten so unaffordable. I think they are more a symptom than a cause.
Fairweather tells Elson that even if the housing bill passes, nominal home prices will not fall; the bill would only slow their rise.
I don't think that home prices will go down in terms of the sticker price that you see, but what will happen is that home prices won't go up as much as they would in the absence of this bill
Foreclosures “at a six-year high… up, get this folks, 26% year over year. There was 119,000 foreclosure filings in the first quarter of 2026” (citing WSJ/ATTOM)