← All topics
Bonds
5 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral · exact words, dated and sourced
+7
What the people who move markets are saying about this, in their own
words. These are views on the record, not scored bets: when a call here grows a number
and a deadline, it moves to the scoreboard. Newest first.
All Bullish (5) Bearish (5) Neutral (2)
Bullish
2026-08-01
buy call on oversold duration after the Warsh-week plunge
“the bond market is being a little bit riotous at the moment. And so we would actually be buyers of some of this oversold duration”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.75% → 4.94% (+20 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bearish
2026-07-31
rates must rise on deficit plus tech bond supply; weights = rates garble
“between the government deficit, between the tech bond issuance that is happening this year, weights need to go higher”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.75% → 4.94% (+20 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bearish
2026-07-31
near-term funding costs rise to attract capital
“in the short term, the funding cost is going to have to go up”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.75% → 4.94% (+20 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Neutral
2026-07-30
the bond vigilantes will keep pushing yields up until Warsh actually hikes
“if he's gonna talk hawkish but not actually act hawkish, then they're gonna have to continue to raise rates”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Neutral
2026-07-30
victory lap on opposing the 2024 cuts
“the bond market agreed with me, my friends, the bond vigilantes, took bond yields up 100 basis points. So did the Fed really ease?”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bearish
leaning · 2026-07-30
avoid long-end duration on Fed-injected inflation risk premium
“from our perspective I think we are more wary of that duration risk further out”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bullish
2026-07-30
the long-end selloff misreads softening inflation; market will reassess
“the market is not always correct about this assumption. And to me at this point in time is particularly wrong”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bullish
2026-07-30
extend duration at the very long end as risk compensation, though maybe not really in the US (prefers Japan, UK, Germany); the opposite side of Al-Hussainy
“there's a lot of value on the very long end of the curve because it's compensating for a lot of risk”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bullish
2026-07-30
the long-duration trade is not really in the US but in Japan, UK, Germany
“if I look at a space like Japan like UK like Germany to me is a really low hanging fruits and fixed income”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bullish
2026-07-30
front end yields 40bp over the long end
“the front end of the yield curve looks more attractive today than the long end while still producing you know similar type of income level”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.66% → 4.94% (+28 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Bearish
2026-07-29
why the 30-year sold off
“The long bond doesn't like that they're not fighting inflation.”
US 30-yr yield since this was said: 5.20% → 5.28% (+8 bp) · as of 2026-09-09
Bearish
2026-07-27
positioning against duration. scope is long-duration bonds; she is bullish equities in the same tape
“we've remained very short duration in terms of our portfolio”
US 10-yr yield since this was said: 4.64% → 4.94% (+30 bp) · as of 2026-09-10
Head to head
Pick any two voices in this debate; their freshest claims go side by side.
Lisa Shalett Mohamed El-Erian Ed Yardeni Ed Al-Hussainy Nicolo Bocchin Bryan Whalen Ken Shinoda Kate Moore
Lisa Shalett Mohamed El-Erian Ed Yardeni Ed Al-Hussainy Nicolo Bocchin Bryan Whalen Ken Shinoda Kate Moore
Follow Bonds
One short email when this debate moves: new calls, reversals, verdicts. Plain words, free.